On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Leonidas Fegaras <[email protected]>wrote:
> We now have group accounts at the Nexus repository to release MRQL > artifacts > (see > https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/INFRA-6703<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6703>) > > I have already stored the first MRQL snapshot. The current source tarball > is at: > https://repository.apache.org/**content/repositories/** > snapshots/org/apache/mrql/**mrql-src-dist/<https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/mrql/mrql-src-dist/> > > The binary tarball is at: > https://repository.apache.org/**content/repositories/** > snapshots/org/apache/mrql/**mrql-bin-dist/<https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/mrql/mrql-bin-dist/> > > I think we are now ready to initiate the process for releasing our first > release (MRQL 0.9.0). > I would need somebody to do some sanity checks first. > > 1) I am using the maven rat plugin to find any missing licenses. But I > skipped test queries and data. I cannot put license info on data. Do you > think I should put license info on every query in tests/queries? > AFAIK, all the tests/queries also should have the license info. > > 2) Please check the NOTICE file for completeness/correctness. > > 3) Spark has become an ASF incubating project very recently. So I assume > that I don't have to include any license for Spark. Is this OK? > > 4) I have included javadocs in the src tarball only. Do you think I should > include them in the bin tarball too? > Users typically use binary tarballs. I think it is a good idea to include javadocs in the binary as well. > > After this, > > 1) I will stage the tarballs on Nexus for voting > > 2) I will start two threads in [email protected]: one for PPMC vote and one > for discussion > > 3) if the PPMC accepts this release, I will send email to [email protected] ask > for discussion, feedback, and vote for approval. > > Is there anything that I have missed? > Thanks for your help. > Leonidas > >
