See also http://www.apache.org/dev/release-publishing
We have to create our KEYS file - http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html#keys-policy - and upload it somewhere. Maybe http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/mrql/ All release candidate artifacts should be signed by author using PGP, SHA1, and MD5 signatures. Here's incubator project release vote example - http://markmail.org/message/cxyydek2vq3ioroh On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 4:57 AM, Karthik Kambatla <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Leonidas Fegaras <[email protected]>wrote: > >> We now have group accounts at the Nexus repository to release MRQL >> artifacts >> (see >> https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/INFRA-6703<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6703>) >> >> I have already stored the first MRQL snapshot. The current source tarball >> is at: >> https://repository.apache.org/**content/repositories/** >> snapshots/org/apache/mrql/**mrql-src-dist/<https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/mrql/mrql-src-dist/> >> >> The binary tarball is at: >> https://repository.apache.org/**content/repositories/** >> snapshots/org/apache/mrql/**mrql-bin-dist/<https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/mrql/mrql-bin-dist/> >> >> I think we are now ready to initiate the process for releasing our first >> release (MRQL 0.9.0). >> I would need somebody to do some sanity checks first. >> >> 1) I am using the maven rat plugin to find any missing licenses. But I >> skipped test queries and data. I cannot put license info on data. Do you >> think I should put license info on every query in tests/queries? >> > AFAIK, all the tests/queries also should have the license info. > >> >> 2) Please check the NOTICE file for completeness/correctness. >> >> 3) Spark has become an ASF incubating project very recently. So I assume >> that I don't have to include any license for Spark. Is this OK? >> >> 4) I have included javadocs in the src tarball only. Do you think I should >> include them in the bin tarball too? >> > Users typically use binary tarballs. I think it is a good idea to include > javadocs in the binary as well. > > >> >> After this, >> >> 1) I will stage the tarballs on Nexus for voting >> >> 2) I will start two threads in [email protected]: one for PPMC vote and one >> for discussion >> >> 3) if the PPMC accepts this release, I will send email to [email protected] >> ask for discussion, feedback, and vote for approval. >> >> Is there anything that I have missed? >> Thanks for your help. >> Leonidas >> >> -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @eddieyoon
