Hi Leonidas Thanks for leading this vote. If we get to a point where the community doesn't speak up, we can conclude the vote and move it to the IPMC list.
John On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 11:19 AM Fegaras, Leonidas <fega...@cse.uta.edu> wrote: > Dear MRQL community, > This is a reminder to vote on retiring the MRQL podling by replying to > this email. > Leonidas Fegaras > > ________________________________________ > From: Fegaras, Leonidas <fega...@cse.uta.edu> > Sent: Monday, August 7, 2017 9:02 AM > To: dev@mrql.incubator.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Retire the MRQL Podling > > Dear MRQL community, > According to the "Guide to Retirement" [1] and after the request for > public discussion on the MRQL dev list [2], I would like to call for a > vote to retire MRQL. > MRQL has been dormant during the last four months. MRQL is incubating > for more than four years. We had four releases but very little > community growth (one new PMC member in 2014 and one new committer in > 2016). Due to lack of activity and growth in the podling, I call for > a vote to retire the podling. > The vote will be held open for at least 120 hours (5 days). > If there are no negative binding votes, I will call for a follow-up > vote on the Incubator PMC to confirm the decision to retire MRQL. > Please vote on retiring MRQL: > > [ ] +1 Yes, retire Apache MRQL from the Apache Incubator > [ ] 0 I am undecided > [ ] -1 No, do not retire Apache MRQL because... > > My vote is a sad +1 (binding) > > [1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/retirement.html > [2] http://markmail.org/message/chpyym5gvsa6sfgd > >
