Are there any objections to using the Apache JIRA for mxnet development
tracking?  If not, how do we get it set up?

On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 8:32 AM, Suneel Marthi <[email protected]> wrote:

> I am not following, wouldn't a jira be assigned to the guy working on it -
> so where is the question of multiple folks working on one feature
>
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Bhavin Thaker <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 : Chris has an important question.
> >
> > How do we ensure that a feature/task for a particular Apache project is
> not
> > worked on by multiple folks at the same time?
> >
> > Is there a recommendation for a tool/process from the Apache group?
> >
> > This also provides a central, consolidated place to know who is working
> on
> > what.
> >
> > Bhavin Thaker.
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 5:06 AM Joern Kottmann <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > A good way to coordinate is to use the dev list and/or state on the
> > > issues that you are interested in it and are working on it.
> > >
> > > We use Jira for years at Apache OpenNLP for all the issues we deal
> > > with. At GitHub we use the Pull Request feature and synchronize all
> > > comments with the corresponding Jira issue.
> > >
> > > My opinion is that Jira does much more then we actually use/need, and
> > > is sometimes slightly unresponsive (e.g. takes 1 or 2 seconds to load
> > > a new page) on the other hand, the GitHub issue tracker ist too simple
> > > and is missing a few useful features.
> > >
> > > Jörn
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Henri Yandell <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > > Yes, Apache JIRA is free to use.
> > > >
> > > > My observations of GitHub are that roadmaps/wishlist features need
> > better
> > > > separation from bug reports. Ideally you want a nice big list of
> ideas
> > > for
> > > > future work, and a list of bug reports and smaller contributions that
> > > > you're always driving down to zero. One way to do that could be to
> put
> > > the
> > > > new features in JIRA, while keeping GitHub for bug reports, not sure
> if
> > > > that's what you were getting to Chris with the question.
> > > >
> > > > Hen
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 9:23 PM, sandeep krishnamurthy <
> > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> +1
> > > >> Thanks Chris for bringing up this important topic.
> > > >>
> > > >> I would really like to prioritize this topic and request users and
> > > mentors
> > > >> to come up a process or suggestions on how to:
> > > >> 1. Request for contributions from the community.
> > > >> 2. A community member raising feature requests.
> > > >> 3. A community member ready to contribute a feature or bug fix.
> > > >> 4. A community member actively proposing and driving a big new
> feature
> > > for
> > > >> the project.
> > > >>
> > > >> Projects in Github, Tagging Github issues with Call for
> Contributions
> > > may
> > > >> seem very straight forward approach. But, is there any other
> > > suggestions or
> > > >> standard practice to drive such efforts?
> > > >>
> > > >> This will go a long way in keeping community members informed about
> > what
> > > >> next in the project, how can they be part and how they can set
> future
> > > >> directions in the project. Also, saving the time and effort in
> > > duplication
> > > >> of efforts.
> > > >>
> > > >> Regards,
> > > >> Sandeep
> > > >>
> > > >> On Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 4:48 AM, Chris Olivier <
> [email protected]>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Is Apache JIRA free to use? What do most projects use? While it's
> > > natural
> > > >> > that some companies have internal priorities which drive their
> > > >> development
> > > >> > plans, how do other Apache projects avoid having the same feature
> > > >> developed
> > > >> > independently by more than one party, because they isn't know the
> > > other
> > > >> was
> > > >> > working on it already?  Or coordinate forces (so to speak) on a
> > large
> > > >> > feature or initiative?
> > > >> >
> > > >> > -Chris
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> Sandeep Krishnamurthy
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to