I think one thing that could draw more users would be published benchmarks that show that networks implemented using MXNet perform better than comparable ones using other platforms using the same hardware. If you can definitively show that MXNet is much faster and/or uses much less memory, you will attract much more interest.
- Christopher On 2/25/18, 11:53 PM, "Li, Mu" <[email protected]> wrote: That's a great idea. The thing Simon's team is doing is publishing more tutorials on both MXNet website and AWS blog, which may attract a lot of traffics. Also Sukwon is tracking the progress of publishing news more frequently on the homepage. Best, Mu > On Feb 25, 2018, at 8:48 PM, Chris Olivier <[email protected]> wrote: > > My (probably less-than-$0.02): > > I have as my home page on my > phone, the Google Research Blog, and they frequently release stuff like > data sets and models do this or that. Usually it seems pretty interesting > and I am compelled to try it. > > Maybe we do something similar, but I’m not aware of it. I know we have all > sorts of examples and whatnot, but it doesn’t seem the same as what at > least appears to be something new to play with scrolling past every couple > of weeks: > > For example, a few days ago: > > “Introducing the HDR+ Burst Photography Dataset”. > > https://research.googleblog.com/2018/02/introducing-hdr-burst-photography.html?m=1 > > Reading that makes me want to download it and play around. Obviously I > would use Tensorflow by default because it’s ready to roll as-is with this > dataset/model. > > > -Chris > > > >> On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 8:34 PM Mu Li <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Not sure why the screenshot of the page view is not there, attach it again: >> >> >> Best, >> Mu >> >>> On Feb 25, 2018, at 8:32 PM, Li, Mu <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Team, >>> >>> We are in trouble attracting new users. According to Google analytics, >> there is almost no increase in the number of paper views for the document >> site mxnet.io. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> The number of paper views is an important metric for the adoption, I >> would like to take actions to improve this number. It includes improving >> the website so that users can get information easier. However, the current >> website displays the last stable version instead of the master branch. Then >> the effect of a modification, namely the user behaviors, may need a few >> months to observe, which is definitely not effective. >>> >>> One aggressive idea is just showing the master branch in default during >> the website improvement period (may take 3 months). Another way is >> releasing more frequently, e.g a new release per 2 weeks. >>> >>> What's your thoughts? >>> >>> Best, >>> Mu >>
