Do you have specific public benchmarks in mind? On Mar 1, 2018 10:13, "Barber, Christopher" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think one thing that could draw more users would be published benchmarks > that show that networks implemented using MXNet perform better than > comparable ones using other platforms using the same hardware. If you can > definitively show that MXNet is much faster and/or uses much less memory, > you will attract much more interest. > > - Christopher > > On 2/25/18, 11:53 PM, "Li, Mu" <[email protected]> wrote: > > That's a great idea. The thing Simon's team is doing is publishing > more tutorials on both MXNet website and AWS blog, which may attract a lot > of traffics. Also Sukwon is tracking the progress of publishing news more > frequently on the homepage. > > Best, > Mu > > > On Feb 25, 2018, at 8:48 PM, Chris Olivier <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > My (probably less-than-$0.02): > > > > I have as my home page on my > > phone, the Google Research Blog, and they frequently release stuff > like > > data sets and models do this or that. Usually it seems pretty > interesting > > and I am compelled to try it. > > > > Maybe we do something similar, but I’m not aware of it. I know we > have all > > sorts of examples and whatnot, but it doesn’t seem the same as what > at > > least appears to be something new to play with scrolling past every > couple > > of weeks: > > > > For example, a few days ago: > > > > “Introducing the HDR+ Burst Photography Dataset”. > > > > https://research.googleblog.com/2018/02/introducing-hdr- > burst-photography.html?m=1 > > > > Reading that makes me want to download it and play around. > Obviously I > > would use Tensorflow by default because it’s ready to roll as-is > with this > > dataset/model. > > > > > > -Chris > > > > > > > >> On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 8:34 PM Mu Li <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Not sure why the screenshot of the page view is not there, attach > it again: > >> > >> > >> Best, > >> Mu > >> > >>> On Feb 25, 2018, at 8:32 PM, Li, Mu <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi Team, > >>> > >>> We are in trouble attracting new users. According to Google > analytics, > >> there is almost no increase in the number of paper views for the > document > >> site mxnet.io. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> The number of paper views is an important metric for the adoption, > I > >> would like to take actions to improve this number. It includes > improving > >> the website so that users can get information easier. However, the > current > >> website displays the last stable version instead of the master > branch. Then > >> the effect of a modification, namely the user behaviors, may need a > few > >> months to observe, which is definitely not effective. > >>> > >>> One aggressive idea is just showing the master branch in default > during > >> the website improvement period (may take 3 months). Another way is > >> releasing more frequently, e.g a new release per 2 weeks. > >>> > >>> What's your thoughts? > >>> > >>> Best, > >>> Mu > >> > > > >
