Hi Marco, For MKL/MKLDNN --> I don't think we should build since its still experimental. Its sad that MKLML was removed without a proper discussion, granted I have not tested with CUDA 9.2, I will building on a AWS Ubuntu instance that is built with CUDA 9.0, I presume it should work fine.
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 5:31 PM, Marco de Abreu < marco.g.ab...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi Naveen, > > thank you for driving the releases for the Scala packages! > > For CPU, I'd propose add MKL/MKLDNN builds. > > For GPU, do we have to specify the minor version of CUDA up front or are > they interchangeable? CUDA 9.2, for example, received some quite > significant performance updates and it would be great if our users could > use them. > > Best regards, > Marco > > On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 8:28 PM, Naveen Swamy <mnnav...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I am working on publishing the Scala package from 1.2.0 release. What do > > you recommend should be the configuration for the Scala Packages ? > > > > I am thinking of the below > > For CPU build with > > OPENBLAS > > LAPACK > > > > For GPU build with > > OPENBLAS > > CUDA 9.0 > > NCCL > > > > Let me know if you concerns or recommendations. > > > > Thanks, Naveen > > >
