Hi Da,

Can you please open a PR to the 1.2 branch with the following PRs mentioned
by you and Tao cherry picked onto release branch.

https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/10979
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/10731
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/10651
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/10624
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/10619
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/10616
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/10918
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/10613

I am a little concerned about the below two PRs since they don't have
enough tests:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/10706
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/10810

<https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/10810>
Can you please talk about the test coverage of these two PRs.

Hi Tao,

To answer your question about the criteria for choosing PRs for patch
release: I think we haven't done patch release many times before and we
don't have a clear set of criteria on what can go into the patch release.
The main intention of doing patch release is to fix the undocumented
backwards incompatible change from 1.1. Along with this critical fixes
should also be pushed out. AFAIK, The "critical" here is not clearly
defined by the community yet and we should use our best judgement here.
According to me,  everything which has potential to impact a large number
of MXNet users can be considered critical.

The timeline for the patch release is "as soon as possible".
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11049 is not critical and
will show up in mxnet.io docs in master when it is merged. I would be
little hesitant about https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11095
since it lacks test currently. We can consider
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11047 if it is merged in
time.

Anirudh



On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 2:27 PM, Naveen Swamy <mnnav...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Anirudh,
>
> I would like to get the fixes that was made to publish to Maven into 1.2.1
> -- currently in PR https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11147/
>
> Also additionally, I would like to get the fix for
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/10436 - currently another
> contributor Andrew is working on it.
>
> -Naveen
>
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 8:33 AM, Lv, Tao A <tao.a...@intel.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for bringing this up, Da!
> >
> > It would be great if we can have these fixes into 1.2.1 patch release,
> > especially for https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/10651, it
> > has fixed https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/11028 .
> >
> > What I want to add are:
> > 1. https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/10810 which fixed
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/10809 .
> > 2. https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/10613 for doc
> > improvement.
> >
> > I don't quite understand the criteria for choosing patch PRs and what's
> > the timeline of 1.2.1 patch release. If it's possible, I also want to
> have
> > below PRs. But it depends the progress of review and merging.
> > 1. bug fix: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11095 (under
> > review)
> > 2. perf improvement: https://github.com/apache/
> incubator-mxnet/pull/11047
> > (approved)
> > 3. doc improvement: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11049
> > (under review)
> >
> > BR,
> > -tao
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Zheng, Da [mailto:dzz...@amazon.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 7, 2018 8:55 AM
> > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org
> > Cc: Emani, Ashok <ashok.em...@intel.com>; Lv, Tao A <tao.a...@intel.com
> >;
> > Zhao, Patric <patric.z...@intel.com>; Zai, Alexander <alex...@amazon.com
> >
> > Subject: Re: Regarding 1.2.1 patch release
> >
> > Hello Anirudh,
> >
> > Could you merge the bugs below? Each of the bug fixes below come with a
> > set of tests and many of them are critical for Gluon.
> > MKLDNN:
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/10979
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/10731
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/10706
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/10651
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/10624
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/10619
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/10616
> >
> > Others:
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/10918
> >
> > @Ashok @Tao @Patric @Alex, do you have other important MKLDNN bug fixes
> > that should be merged?
> >
> > Best,
> > Da
> >
> > On 6/6/18, 5:23 PM, "Anirudh" <anirudh2...@gmail.com<mailto:
> > anirudh2...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     Hi,
> >
> >     I wanted to bring up some MKLDNN fixes that went into master but not
> > into
> >     1.2.
> >     Should these changes be going to the patch release ? We had kept some
> >     changes from going into 1.2 branch since we were waiting for the test
> > suite
> >     for MKLDNN.
> >     Is this test suite planned for the next major or minor release? Also,
> > are
> >     there any critical MKLDNN bug fixes which are in master and well
> > tested and
> >     can go into the patch release ?
> >
> >     Anirudh
> >
> >
> >     On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 1:48 PM, Anirudh <anirudh2...@gmail.com
> <mailto:
> > anirudh2...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     > Hi all,
> >     >
> >     > As you may be aware, 1.2 has an undocumented backwards incompatible
> > change
> >     > relating to saving and loading params. Please see:
> > https://github.com/
> >     > apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/11091.
> >     >
> >     > More details about the fix will be tracked here:
> > https://issues.apache.
> >     > org/jira/browse/MXNET-518
> >     >
> >     > The above fix will go as part of the 1.2.1 patch release which will
> > be
> >     > coming out soon.
> >     >
> >     > In addition to this, we will also be including:
> https://github.com/
> >     > apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11142
> >     >
> >     > I request the community to point out other bug fixes that are
> > critical and
> >     > should go as part of 1.2.1 patch release.
> >     >
> >     > Anirudh
> >     >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to