Oh great. Thanks, Chen for clarifying. That's correct, the Clojure uses the Scala generation which makes use of this :)
On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 9:59 AM, Naveen Swamy <[email protected]> wrote: > No need to be disappointed, Scala generated APIs by code generation for > ndarray and symbol and if clojure depends on Scala it get those as well. > > > On Jun 10, 2018, at 3:40 PM, Chen HY <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Yep. An example is the cpp port used following code to generate op.h > > automatically. > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/blob/master/ > cpp-package/scripts/OpWrapperGenerator.py > > > > It makes easier for everyone to follow up with the latest APIs. > > It is disappointing if the python version supports the latest API but the > > version of your favorite language doesn't. > > > > 2018-06-10 14:19 GMT+01:00 Naveen Swamy <[email protected]>: > > > >> this is fantastic, thanks for being a champ. I am glad to have you join > us > >> :). Yes, we would love to make it work and be available for our users, > you > >> can make features available iteratively. I understand you alone can't > have > >> everything in one go, I am hoping more contributors will join the > effort. > >> > >> My guess is Chen is recommending generation of Clojure code from Scala. > >> > >>> On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 2:55 PM, Carin Meier <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>> Naveen, > >>> > >>> Thanks. I appreciate your help. I acknowledge there are some challenges > >> in > >>> trying to bring in a new language package, but I think if we can make > it > >>> work, it will be the best way for it to grow along with the MXNet > project > >>> and be a good fit with its goals and ecosystem long term. > >>> > >>> I added a confluence page of the general state of what is working and > >> needs > >>> help. > >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/ > >>> Clojure+Package+Contribution+Needs. > >>> Feel free to edit. > >>> > >>> Chen, > >>> > >>> I added the code generator use on the page as well. I don't fully > >>> understand what you are proposing, but I would like to. If you could > >>> provide some more details to help me, that would be great. > >>> > >>> - Carin > >>> > >>> > >>>> On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 8:00 AM, Chen HY <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>> > >>>> I personally think that is the reason the clojure package should use > >> more > >>>> code generator. > >>>> It makes easier to build everything align with scala package. > >>>> > >>>> 2018-06-10 12:45 GMT+01:00 Naveen Swamy <[email protected]>: > >>>> > >>>>> I have called for contribution within my organization to help with > >> the > >>>>> review, some of them have shown interest and hope to see them help > >> with > >>>> the > >>>>> review. Carin, I learnt you are popular to have given great talks on > >>>>> Clojure. > >>>>> > >>>>> Could I please ask you document what functionality is working and > >> what > >>>>> parts of it need contribution. > >>>>> > >>>>> In general I want to request a few things: > >>>>> Good API documentation, > >>>>> Examples, turn examples into integration tests. > >>>>> Tests, more tests > >>>>> Everything testable on CI. > >>>>> > >>>>> In the long term, We have to think how to maintain API compatibility > >>> and > >>>>> tests across language bindings. > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks, Naveen > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Sat, Jun 9, 2018 at 2:38 AM, YiZhi Liu <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Carin, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thank you for the great work. I'll do the review. As I have no > >>>>>> expertise in Clojure, it will really help to have people from > >> Clojure > >>>>>> community reviewing it as well :) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> 2018-06-08 14:22 GMT-07:00 Carin Meier <[email protected]>: > >>>>>>> A couple of questions came up in regard to the PR and the current > >>>> test > >>>>>>> suite state as well as the best way to review the PR since it is > >> a > >>>> new > >>>>>>> language binding. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> In regards to the Clojure test suite, most of the Scala test > >> suite > >>>> has > >>>>>> been > >>>>>>> ported over with the goal of having comparable coverage. I can go > >>>>> ahead a > >>>>>>> put in a coverage tool to make that it a bit more transparent. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> For reviewing, I have a couple people in the Clojure community > >> that > >>>> are > >>>>>>> interested in collaborating in this project and I can ask them > >> for > >>>> help > >>>>>> in > >>>>>>> reviewing the PR in some way if that is helpful too. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I'm also open to other suggestions. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>> Carin > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 4:06 PM, Carin Meier < > >> [email protected]> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Here is the PR https://github.com/apache/ > >>> incubator-mxnet/pull/11205 > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I've ported in the content from the external github repo ( > >>>>>>>> https://github.com/gigasquid/clojure-mxnet), that has been > >> tested > >>>> by > >>>>>> some > >>>>>>>> of the Clojure community, into the contrib directory. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> There is still lots more to do in relation to adding tests, > >>>>> benchmarks, > >>>>>>>> and increasing stability, but I thought this might be a good > >> point > >>>> to > >>>>>> bring > >>>>>>>> it in initially so that the other work can be reviewed in > >> smaller > >>>>>> chunks. > >>>>>>>> I also would like to get other people involved in making it > >>> better, > >>>>> so I > >>>>>>>> thought that having the base package in there would be a good > >>>> starting > >>>>>>>> point for collaboration. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Feedback welcome. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> - Carin > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 11:40 AM, Carin Meier < > >>> [email protected]> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Thanks everyone. I'll work on getting together a PR with your > >>>>> feedback > >>>>>>>>> and post it here. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 4:05 AM, Chen HY <[email protected] > >>> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I would suggest using code generators in case upstream library > >>>>> adding > >>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>> functions for arrays. > >>>>>>>>>> It seems that cpp binding is using a code generator and works > >>>> fine. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> 2018-06-05 7:59 GMT+01:00 Naveen Swamy <[email protected]>: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> ~/mxnet/contrib/clojure-package good place for the code. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> the package name org.apache.mxnet.contrib.clojure ? do you > >>> need > >>>>>> mxnet > >>>>>>>>>>> again? > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> I forgot to request to run some benchmarks and document. One > >>> of > >>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>> reasons > >>>>>>>>>>> users use MXNet is because of its performance and we want to > >>>>> ensure > >>>>>>>>>> that we > >>>>>>>>>>> maintain it across language bindings. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Also invite your other clojure programmer buddies to the > >> party > >>>> :) > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, Naveen > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 1:55 PM, Carin Meier < > >>>> [email protected] > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Oh right. That's not a problem, I wonder if something like > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.mxnet.contrib/clojure-mxnet > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> would work? > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> If this seems like it is the right direction, we could > >> work > >>>> out > >>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>> details > >>>>>>>>>>>> in a PR. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 4:44 PM, Naveen Swamy < > >>>>> [email protected]> > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree with your assessment that we shouldn't need the > >>> user > >>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>> change > >>>>>>>>>>>>> their code. I am not sure if we can release under > >>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.clojure-mxnet > >>>>>>>>>>>>> we might have to stick with our primary group id > >>>>>> org.apache.mxnet > >>>>>>>>>> and > >>>>>>>>>>> may > >>>>>>>>>>>>> be create a sub-package under it? any creative ideas? > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 1:29 PM, Carin Meier < > >>>>>> [email protected]> > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the feedback everyone. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree on the contrib option. I think it's a great > >> path > >>>>>> forward > >>>>>>>>>> and > >>>>>>>>>>>>> would > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> allow it time for feedback, contribution by others, > >> and > >>>>>>>>>>> stabilization. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> If I'm understanding correctly, that would mean > >> putting > >>>> the > >>>>>>>>>> source > >>>>>>>>>>> code > >>>>>>>>>>>>> in: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ~/mxnet/contrib/clojure-package > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and having the artifact jar named > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> `org.apache.contrib.clojure-mxnet/clojure-mxnet` > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would recommend not having the individual namespaces > >>> of > >>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>> files > >>>>>>>>>>>> have > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> contrib embedded in them, so that if it graduates, > >> users > >>>>> won't > >>>>>>>>>> have > >>>>>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> change their code, only the dependency. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please let me know if this is correct or if there are > >>> any > >>>>>> other > >>>>>>>>>>> ideas. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Carin > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 4:03 PM, Naveen Swamy < > >>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think that's a great idea to bring in under > >> contrib > >>>> and > >>>>> we > >>>>>>>>>> can > >>>>>>>>>>> also > >>>>>>>>>>>>> get > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> user feedback > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 4, 2018, at 12:44 PM, sandeep > >> krishnamurthy < > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Carin, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is a commendable work. Thanks a lot for all > >> the > >>>>> hard > >>>>>> and > >>>>>>>>>>> smart > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> work > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you have put behind this :-) I think this will be > >> a > >>>>> great > >>>>>>>>>> value > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> addition. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If people are not sure about usage, can I suggest > >>> this > >>>>>>>>>> awesome > >>>>>>>>>>> work > >>>>>>>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> brought in "contrib" package? Invite and build the > >>>>>> community > >>>>>>>>>>> around > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Clojure, stabilize and increase the coverage, and > >>>> based > >>>>> on > >>>>>>>>>> usage > >>>>>>>>>>>> and > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> development, graduate it to main stable support > >> from > >>>>>> contrib. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Suggestions and thoughts? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sandeep > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 12:27 PM, Ivan Serdyuk < > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello everyone. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A small comment, about Scala API: main commiters > >>> are > >>>>>> hardly > >>>>>>>>>>>>> available, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for today. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As for Clojure - I might suggest that it might be > >>>>>> possible > >>>>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>>>> enlight > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> future work, for that package, for Clojure > >>>> developers. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 8:50 PM, Naveen Swamy < > >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Carin, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is great effort and very nicely documented. > >>>> When > >>>>> I > >>>>>>>>>>> surveyed > >>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> my > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> day > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> job on the interest for Scala packages there > >> were > >>> a > >>>>> few > >>>>>>>>>> people > >>>>>>>>>>>> who > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> specifically were interested in the Clojure > >>>> packages, > >>>>> I > >>>>>>>>>> think > >>>>>>>>>>>> those > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> are > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people who might have tried and understand the > >>>>>> complexity > >>>>>>>>>> of > >>>>>>>>>>>> making > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scala > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work in Clojure. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am in support of a MXNet-Clojure package, I > >>>> request > >>>>>> you > >>>>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>> add > >>>>>>>>>>>>> more > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unit > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests and integration tests that can be ported > >> to > >>>> CI. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your efforts. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Naveen > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 6:16 PM, Carin Meier < > >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is always a good thing to consider the cost > >>> with > >>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>> benefit. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> best to explain what I see the tradeoffs to be. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> First, I wanted to clarify that it took > >>> significant > >>>>>>>>>>> development > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> effort > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get the Clojure package and the interop working > >>>>>> properly > >>>>>>>>>>> despite > >>>>>>>>>>>>> my > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simple > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> looking design on the confluence page :) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> One of the advantages of MXNet over its > >>> competitors > >>>>> is > >>>>>> its > >>>>>>>>>>> many > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> language > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> support. The Clojure package would only > >> increase > >>>> the > >>>>>>>>>> value of > >>>>>>>>>>>> this > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> proposition and bring new users and growth into > >>> the > >>>>>>>>>> community. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, there is a cost associated with adding > >>>> this > >>>>>>>>>> language > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> support > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you pointed out. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since the Clojure package right now is only > >>> reliant > >>>>> on > >>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>> Scala > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> jars > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maven, it can exist outside the main project as > >>> an > >>>>>>>>>> independent > >>>>>>>>>>>>> repo > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but I > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think that would lessen the growth benefit both > >>> to > >>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>> Clojure > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> community > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and to the MXNet community to not be included > >> as > >>> a > >>>>>> first > >>>>>>>>>> class > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> language. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I believe having first class Clojure support in > >>>> MXNet > >>>>>> is > >>>>>>>>>>>> valuable, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> but > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cost of that support is up to the community to > >>>>> decide. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there a process for considering a new > >> package > >>> in > >>>>>> MXNet? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Carin > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 5:51 PM, Chen HY < > >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have checked the issue and the confluence > >> page, > >>>> but > >>>>>> still > >>>>>>>>>>>>> curious. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Clojure and Scala are both JVM based > >> languages. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They, as well as many JVM based languages, can > >>>> share > >>>>>>>>>> their > >>>>>>>>>>>> class > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> method > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at a certain level. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why should the community maintain two APIs for > >>> two > >>>>>>>>>> languages > >>>>>>>>>>>> with > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> can > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> share > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their packages with almost zero effort? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2018-06-01 21:58 GMT+01:00 Carin Meier < > >>>>>>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>>>>>>>> : > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've been working on a Clojure package for > >>> MXNet. > >>>>>> Since > >>>>>>>>>>>> Clojure > >>>>>>>>>>>>> is > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JVM > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> language, the package leverages the great > >> work > >>> of > >>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>> existing > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scala > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> package. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would appreciate any feedback and testing. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here is the original issue: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ > >>>>>> incubator-mxnet/issues/8971 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Architecture & Design: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/ > >>>> confluence/display/MXNET/ > >>>>>>>>>>>> MXNet+Clojure > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and the github repo for rapid testing and > >> issue > >>>>>> fixing > >>>>>>>>>>> before > >>>>>>>>>>>> of > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opening > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> official PR https://github.com/gigasquid/ > >>>>>> clojure-mxnet > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm also active in the slack channel so feel > >>> free > >>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>> ping me > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> there. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Carin Meier > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chen Hanyang 陈涵洋 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Software School Fudan University > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +86-138-1881-7745 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sandeep Krishnamurthy > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>> Chen Hanyang 陈涵洋 > >>>>>>>>>> Software School Fudan University > >>>>>>>>>> +86-138-1881-7745 > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> Yizhi Liu > >>>>>> DMLC member > >>>>>> Amazon Web Services > >>>>>> Vancouver, Canada > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Chen Hanyang 陈涵洋 > >>>> Software School Fudan University > >>>> +86-138-1881-7745 > >>>> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Chen Hanyang 陈涵洋 > > Software School Fudan University > > +86-138-1881-7745 >
