Hi all,

Thanks a lot for checking the release. This vote has passed with:

6 +1s

Binding:
Sandeep
Haibin
Indhu

Non Binding:
Carin
Pedro
Lai

Anirudh


On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 8:00 AM, sandeep krishnamurthy <
sandeep.krishn...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> Lai (https://github.com/roywei) and myself tested with Keras-MXNet for CNN
> and RNN standard use cases, things are working as expected on CPU and GPU.
>
> Best,
> Sandeep
>
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 11:06 PM Anirudh <anirudh2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Thanks for checking the release. We need one more binding +1. I would
> > request committers to help out here so that we can get the vote started
> on
> > general@.
> >
> > Anirudh
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 3:06 PM, Pedro Larroy <
> > pedro.larroy.li...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I already changed my vote to +1   I don't think this a big issue, just
> a
> > > pixel difference of 1 when loading an image.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 2:20 PM Marco de Abreu
> > > <marco.g.ab...@googlemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> > >
> > > > We had 868 successful runs and no failures for that test so far,
> Pedro.
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 11:17 PM Pedro Larroy <
> > > > pedro.larroy.li...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Observed just one failure in OSX in test_imdecode:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > ======================================================================
> > > > > FAIL: test_imdecode (test_image.TestImage)
> > > > >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > Traceback (most recent call last):
> > > > >   File
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > "/Users/pllarroy/devel/mxnet/mxnet_release/tests/python/
> > > unittest/test_image.py",
> > > > > line 94, in test_imdecode
> > > > >     assert_almost_equal(image.asnumpy(), cv_image)
> > > > >   File
> > > > > "/Users/pllarroy/devel/mxnet/mxnet_release/python/mxnet/
> > > test_utils.py",
> > > > > line 493, in assert_almost_equal
> > > > >     raise AssertionError(msg)
> > > > > AssertionError:
> > > > > Items are not equal:
> > > > > Error 980.392157 exceeds tolerance rtol=0.000010, atol=0.000000.
> > > > Location
> > > > > of maximum error:(100, 457, 1), a=103.000000, b=102.000000
> > > > >  a: array([[[  0,  10,  20],
> > > > >         [  0,  11,  19],
> > > > >         [  2,  12,  19],...
> > > > >  b: array([[[  0,  10,  20],
> > > > >         [  0,  11,  19],
> > > > >         [  2,  12,  19],...
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > Ran 505 tests in 2018.430s
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Is this one known?
> > > > >
> > > > > The other unit tests passed.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 2:09 PM Haibin Lin <
> haibin.lin....@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Built from source with CUDA on Ubuntu.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ran example/gluon/word_language_model/train.py
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > Haibin
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 11:08 AM, Anirudh <anirudh2...@gmail.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Pedro,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I think you raised this issue in 1.2.0 release here:
> > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/
> > > ddc088a21aac179144350ea97353a7
> > > > > > > ea885b2765ccb98db08a03ba2d@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
> > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > I actually forgot about this issue during this release. Having
> > said
> > > > > > that, I
> > > > > > > think since this works with make and the customers using cmake
> > with
> > > > > > > USE_OPENMP=OFF should be considerably small we should not block
> > the
> > > > > > release
> > > > > > > for this.
> > > > > > > The main reason we are doing this release is for this issue
> > > > > > > <https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/11091> . Now
> > > > pulling
> > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > change for the cmake fix would be also mean we need to pull 8
> > more
> > > > > > commits
> > > > > > > from dmlc-core and its considerable risk to introduce for the
> > patch
> > > > > > > release.
> > > > > > > This would also mean cutting another rc. I think in the
> interest
> > of
> > > > our
> > > > > > > customers who are eagerly waiting for the patch release to fix
> > the
> > > > main
> > > > > > > issue, we should move ahead here.
> > > > > > > I missed reviewing all the known issue of 1.2.0 and add it to
> > 1.2.1
> > > > > > release
> > > > > > > notes. I will do that now.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Anirudh
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 10:42 AM, Pedro Larroy <
> > > > > > > pedro.larroy.li...@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I think I have fixed this before, I will check if the patch
> > > didn't
> > > > > make
> > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > to the branch.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 10:24 AM Pedro Larroy <
> > > > > > > > pedro.larroy.li...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > -1   I can't compile:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 3rdparty/dmlc-core/libdmlc.a(io.cc.o): In function
> > > > > > > > > `std::thread::thread<dmlc::ThreadedIter<dmlc::io::
> > > > > > > > InputSplitBase::Chunk>::Init(std::function<bool
> > > > > > > > > (dmlc::io::InputSplitBase::Chunk**)>, std::function<void
> > > > > > > > > ()>)::{lambda()#1}&>(dmlc::ThreadedIter<dmlc::io::
> > > > > > > > InputSplitBase::Chunk>::Init(std::function<bool
> > > > > > > > > (dmlc::io::InputSplitBase::Chunk**)>, std::function<void
> > > > > > > > > ()>)::{lambda()#1}&)':
> > > > > > > > > /usr/include/c++/5/thread:137: undefined reference to
> > > > > > `pthread_create'
> > > > > > > > > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> > > > > > > > > ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > No LSB modules are available.
> > > > > > > > > Distributor ID: Ubuntu
> > > > > > > > > Description:    Ubuntu 16.04.4 LTS
> > > > > > > > > Release:        16.04
> > > > > > > > > Codename:       xenial
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > My build script:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > #!/bin/bash
> > > > > > > > > set -e
> > > > > > > > > set -x
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > renice -n 19 -p $$
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > mkdir -p build && cd build
> > > > > > > > > cmake -DUSE_CPP_PACKAGE=ON -DUSE_CUDA=OFF -DUSE_OPENMP=OFF
> > > > > > > > -DUSE_OPENCV=ON
> > > > > > > > > -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug -GNinja ..
> > > > > > > > > ninja -v
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > cd ..
> > > > > > > > > if [ ! -d mxnet_py3 ]; then
> > > > > > > > >     virtualenv -p `which python3` mxnet_py3
> > > > > > > > > fi
> > > > > > > > > source mxnet_py3/bin/activate
> > > > > > > > > cd python
> > > > > > > > > pip install -e .
> > > > > > > > > cd ..
> > > > > > > > > pip install opencv-python
> > > > > > > > > pip install ipython
> > > > > > > > > pip install matplotlib
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 6:33 PM Indhu <
> > indhubhara...@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> +1
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018, 6:52 PM Anirudh <
> > anirudh2...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> > Hi,
> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > >> > This is the vote to release Apache MXNet (incubating)
> > > version
> > > > > > 1.2.1.
> > > > > > > > >> Voting
> > > > > > > > >> > will start now and close Thursday June 21st 7:00 PM PDT.
> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > >> > Link to release candidate 1.2.1.rc0:
> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.2.1.rc0
> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > >> > View this page for installation instructions:
> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > >> > https://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/install/index.html
> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > >> > (Note: The README.md points to the 1.2.1 tag and does
> not
> > > work
> > > > > at
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > >> > moment).
> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > >> > Please remember to test first before voting accordingly.
> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > >> > +1 = approve
> > > > > > > > >> > +0 = no opinion
> > > > > > > > >> > -1 = disapprove (provide reason)
> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > >> > Anirudh
> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Sandeep Krishnamurthy
>

Reply via email to