Thanks for reporting this issue Dom. 08/10 (Frida)y was the major feature freeze date. We won't be accepting any new features now for MXNet 1.3 release. RC0 will be cut on 08/17(Friday).
Will be verifying the performance degradation issue mentioned. Thanks, Roshani On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 8:45 AM Divakaruni, Dominic <ddiva...@amazon.com.invalid> wrote: > Hi all, We tested resnet50 on MXNet built from master branch on Friday and > were seeing degraded performance on GPU - about 50% slower compared to > these values here https://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/faq/perf.html. FWIW > this slowdown was seen for both MXNet as well as the TRT integrated MXNet. > > Something for you all to verify before or after you cut the RC. > > Thx! > > On 8/13/18, 4:34 AM, "kellen sunderland" <kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hey Roshani, > > Has a RC branch already been cut? If so, a quick heads up that I think > this commit should probably get into RC0 for 1.3. > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/ee8755a2531b322fec29c9c3d2aa3b8738da41f3 > > It won't cause issues for users, but from a versioning compatibility > perspective it's probably better that we remove these functions in this > release. This way we don't have to worry about major bumps in the next > release if they're removed. > > -Kellen > > > On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 7:24 PM Roshani Nagmote < > roshaninagmo...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Thanks Kellen and everyone else for working to get TensorRT PR > merged! > > @Sina, I will be keeping track of that issue and fixes to get in the > > release. > > > > We are starting code freeze for 1.3 release today. A release > candidate will > > be cut on 08/17. > > Feel free to add any other comments/suggestions. > > > > Thanks, > > Roshani > > > > On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 5:39 AM kellen sunderland < > > kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > All merged and ready to go from my side Roshani (the TensorRT PR). > > > > > > I agree with Sina that issue 12116 looks it's a blocker. I'll try > and > > > reproduce it locally to get another datapoint. > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 3:15 AM Afrooze, Sina <sina....@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Roshani - I think this regression issue is a release blocker: > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/12116 - Sina > > > > > > > > > > > > On 8/8/18, 12:40 PM, "Roshani Nagmote" < > roshaninagmo...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Thanks, Kellen for letting me know. > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 12:09 PM kellen sunderland < > > > > kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hey Roshani, I think it should be ready by Friday. > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 7, 2018, 10:20 PM Roshani Nagmote < > > > > roshaninagmo...@gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks Kellen. Yes, we were treating this PR as a release > > > blocker. > > > > Do you > > > > > > have any ETA by which it will be completed? Approximate > time > > will > > > > also > > > > > > work. > > > > > > @zhi, Thanks for bringing this PR into notice. I will > keep a > > > track > > > > of it. > > > > > > > > > > > > -Roshani > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 11:30 AM Joshua Z. Zhang < > > > > cheungc...@gmail.com> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > I strongly suggest to track this PR > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11908 < > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11908> > in 1.3 > > > > release > > > > > > > which fixed the usability issue for lower end machines > that > > > > don’t have > > > > > as > > > > > > > large shared memory space as ec2 instances. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Zhi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Aug 7, 2018, at 9:05 AM, Roshani Nagmote < > > > > > roshaninagmo...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Right now, we are delaying MXNet 1.3 release for > pending > > > > TensorRT PR > > > > > ( > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11325 > ). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I wanted to ask everyone for their opinions if we > should > > > delay > > > > the > > > > > > > release > > > > > > > > to get tensorRT integration in or we should go ahead > with > > the > > > > release > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > include tensorRT in next release. Please provide > > suggestions. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Roshani > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 12:45 AM Hagay Lupesko < > > > > lupe...@gmail.com> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Some thoughts: why not keep it out of 1.3, and > merge it > > into > > > > master > > > > > so > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > >> can go out with 1.4 instead? > > > > > > > >> Pros: > > > > > > > >> - Reduce quality risks for 1.3 > > > > > > > >> - More time to test and get feedback before release > > > > > > > >> - Avoid further delays in 1.3 release (lots of good > stuff > > > > there > > > > > > already > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > >> users) > > > > > > > >> Cons: > > > > > > > >> - People will need to get master to experiment with > TRT > > (not > > > > a major > > > > > > > issue > > > > > > > >> IMO) > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> Besides, TRT requires a build flag anyway, so MXNet > users > > > > consuming > > > > > > > built > > > > > > > >> packages (PyPi, Scala) will anyway not be able to > try it > > out > > > > unless > > > > > > > >> building from source... > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> Thoughts? > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> On Sun, Aug 5, 2018 at 10:38 PM Steffen Rochel < > > > > > > steffenroc...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >>> Marek, Kellen, Jun, Da, Eric, myself and a few > other > > people > > > > > discussed > > > > > > > >>> offline about TensorRT integration PR ( > > > > > > > >>> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11325 ). > > We > > > > do > > > > > agree > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > >>> it > > > > > > > >>> would be good to include the PR into upcoming 1.3 > > release, > > > > but are > > > > > > all > > > > > > > >>> concerned about the risk involved and the breaking > API > > > > change. The > > > > > > > >>> discussion converged to following proposal. (1) > change to > > > > contrib > > > > > PR > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > >>> (2) define a different top level API to indicate > that the > > > > package > > > > > is > > > > > > > part > > > > > > > >>> of contrib and experimental (details of API TBD > between > > > > Marek, > > > > > Kellen > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > >>> Eric). This change would allow to include TRT > integration > > > > with v1.3 > > > > > > to > > > > > > > >>> enable users to try TRT with MXNet, minimize the > risk and > > > > avoid > > > > > > > breaking > > > > > > > >>> API change. > > > > > > > >>> To accommodate the change the request is to delay > RC for > > a > > > > few > > > > > days. > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> Regards, > > > > > > > >>> Steffen > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 5:08 PM Roshani Nagmote < > > > > > > > >> roshaninagmo...@gmail.com > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>> wrote: > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>>> Hi, > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> I have created a wiki for tracking MXNet 1.3 > release > > with > > > > the > > > > > > > timeline. > > > > > > > >>>> Please take a look here: > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+1.3.0+Release+Status > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> I am still waiting for following 2 PRs to get > merged: > > > > > > > >>>> TRT integration: > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11325 > > > > > > > >>>> Gluon RNN: > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11482 > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> *Code freeze date is 08/02(Thursday).* Kindly try > to > > > > complete > > > > > > ongoing > > > > > > > >>> work > > > > > > > >>>> and get these PRs merged. > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> Thanks, > > > > > > > >>>> Roshani > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 1:02 PM Roshani Nagmote < > > > > > > > >>> roshaninagmo...@gmail.com > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > >>>> wrote: > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> Hi all, > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> Here is an update on MXNet 1.3 release: > > > > > > > >>>>> I am still waiting for following PRs to get > merged: > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> TRT integration: > > > > > > > >> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11325 > > > > > > > >>>>> Gluon RNN: > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11482 > > > > > > > >>>>> Scala examples: > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11753 > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11621 > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> *New code freeze date is: 08/03* Please try to > get > > your > > > > ongoing > > > > > > PRs > > > > > > > >>>>> merged by then. > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> @Pedro, I didn't include your PRs in tracking > list as > > you > > > > said > > > > > > those > > > > > > > >>> are > > > > > > > >>>>> not critical for now. Please let me know if > those needs > > > to > > > > be > > > > > > > >> included. > > > > > > > >>>>> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11636 > > > > > > > >>>>> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11562 > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> I also have updated project proposal cwiki page > to > > update > > > > the > > > > > > status > > > > > > > >> of > > > > > > > >>>>> PRs. > > > > > > > >>>>> < > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Project+Proposals+for+next+MXNet+Release > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> Please let me know if I am missing something. > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> Thanks, > > > > > > > >>>>> Roshani > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 1:34 PM Pedro Larroy < > > > > > > > >>>> pedro.larroy.li...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > >>>>> wrote: > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> I would like to get these PR merged: > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11636 > > > > > > > >>>>>> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11562 > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> How much longer until the code freeze? > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 1:44 AM Roshani Nagmote > < > > > > > > > >>>>>> roshaninagmo...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > >>>>>> wrote: > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Hi all, > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> PRs waiting to be merged for 1.3 release: > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11325 > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Are there any other PRs waiting to get merged? > Please > > > > let me > > > > > > know. > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Release blocker issue: > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/11853 > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> @Marco, @Kellen, Thanks for bringing up the > important > > > > topic. I > > > > > > > >> agree > > > > > > > >>>>>> with > > > > > > > >>>>>>> you and we(internal Amazon team) will be > working on > > > > fixing the > > > > > > > >>>> disabled > > > > > > > >>>>>>> tests. > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Currently, my colleague, Hao Jin is working on > > > compiling > > > > the > > > > > list > > > > > > > >> of > > > > > > > >>>>>>> disabled tests and leading the effort to fix > them in > > > the > > > > next > > > > > few > > > > > > > >>>> days. > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Thanks, > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Roshani > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 6:39 PM kellen > sunderland < > > > > > > > >>>>>>> kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Thanks again for organizing Roshani. I > believe the > > > > TensorRT > > > > > > > >> work > > > > > > > >>> is > > > > > > > >>>>>>> ready > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> for a merge. Thanks to Marek and all the > NVIDIA > > > people > > > > for > > > > > > > >>>> iterating > > > > > > > >>>>>> on > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> it. If possible could a committer review, > make sure > > > it > > > > meets > > > > > > > >>> their > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> expectations and then merge? PR is here: > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11325 > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> To Marco's point. I'd recommend we review > some of > > > those > > > > > > > >> disabled > > > > > > > >>>>>> tests > > > > > > > >>>>>>> and > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> see how likely they are to affect users > before we > > cut > > > a > > > > > release. > > > > > > > >>>>>> Many of > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> them are obviously not too important from a > user's > > > > point of > > > > > view > > > > > > > >>>> (e.g. > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> downloading a sometimes-offline image in a > test). > > One > > > > idea > > > > > > > >> would > > > > > > > >>> be > > > > > > > >>>>>> to > > > > > > > >>>>>>> try > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> and address as many of the customer impacting > issues > > > as > > > > > possible > > > > > > > >>>>>> between > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> code freeze and the RC0 vote. > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 1:23 PM Marco de Abreu > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> <marco.g.ab...@googlemail.com.invalid> wrote: > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Hello Roshani, > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> frequent releases are good and I'm > supportive for > > > this > > > > in > > > > > > > >>> general > > > > > > > >>>> in > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> order > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> to provide our users with the latest > features and > > > > > > > >> improvements. > > > > > > > >>>> But > > > > > > > >>>>>> at > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> the > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> moment, I'm slightly concerned about the test > > > coverage > > > > due to > > > > > > > >>>> [1]. I > > > > > > > >>>>>>> want > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> us to be conscious about cutting a release > even > > > though > > > > not > > > > > all > > > > > > > >>>> tests > > > > > > > >>>>>>> are > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> enabled (29 disabled tests [2] as of today). > > > However, I > > > > > > > >>>> acknowledge > > > > > > > >>>>>>> that > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> we > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> have improved by a lot lately thanks to > everybody > > > > > > > >> participating > > > > > > > >>>> and > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> leading > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> the efforts around improving flaky tests. > From a > > > > > retrospective > > > > > > > >>>>>> point of > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> view, we could say that these efforts have > actually > > > > revealed > > > > > > > >>> some > > > > > > > >>>>>> quite > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> interesting bugs and thus the time was well > spent > > and > > > > yielded > > > > > > > >>> good > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> results. > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> What does the community think about making > another > > > > sprint of > > > > > > > >>>>>>> improvements > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> around tests followed up by a period of 1-2 > weeks > > > > during > > > > > which > > > > > > > >>> we > > > > > > > >>>>>>> observe > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> the failures closely to ensure that no > critical > > paths > > > > are > > > > > > > >>>> impacted? > > > > > > > >>>>>> If > > > > > > > >>>>>>> we > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> are in a good shape by then, we could > continue the > > > > release > > > > > > > >>> process > > > > > > > >>>>>> and > > > > > > > >>>>>>> at > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> the same time have the advantage of giving > > > > contributors more > > > > > > > >>> lead > > > > > > > >>>>>> time > > > > > > > >>>>>>> to > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> finish their work to ensure it gets into the > > release > > > > in the > > > > > > > >>>> desired > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> quality. > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Again, thanks to everybody for their efforts > during > > > > the last > > > > > > > >>> weeks > > > > > > > >>>>>> to > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> improve the usability and stability of > MXNet. This > > is > > > > great > > > > > > > >>>>>> community > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> effort and a good example of a community > working > > > > together > > > > > > > >>> towards > > > > > > > >>>> a > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> unified > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> goal! > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Best regards, > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Marco > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> [1]: > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d6d81401de796a96677a112d6cd0b074b01f46564194ea89b86c6a3e@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> [2]: > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3A%22Disabled+test%22 > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 8:34 PM Roshani > Nagmote < > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> roshaninagmo...@gmail.com > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Hi all, > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> As mentioned before, code freeze date is > today > > July > > > > 23rd. > > > > > > > >>> Please > > > > > > > >>>>>> try > > > > > > > >>>>>>> to > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> get > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> your ongoing PRs merged by today. > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Please let me know if there are any > concerns or > > need > > > > more > > > > > > > >>> time. > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Roshani > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 1:16 PM Anirudh > Acharya < > > > > > > > >>>>>>> anirudhk...@gmail.com > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> @sandeep krishnamurthy < > > > sandeep.krishn...@gmail.com> > > > > the > > > > > > > >>> bug > > > > > > > >>>>>> fixes > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> in > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> the > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> R-package is something we have just begun, > there > > > > will not > > > > > > > >> be > > > > > > > >>>>>>> anything > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> significant to announce before the v1.3 > code > > > freeze. > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 10:08 PM Steffen > Rochel < > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> steffenroc...@gmail.com > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> To make it easier to find the discussions > > related > > > to > > > > > > > >>> project > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> proposals > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> I > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> added a column with a link to the thread > on dev@ > > > > for > > > > > > > >> most > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> projects. > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Appreciate for the project owners to fill > in the > > > > blanks > > > > > > > >>> and > > > > > > > >>>> to > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> check > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> that I > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> got the right threads. > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Steffen > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 7:11 PM Roshani > Nagmote > > < > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> roshaninagmo...@gmail.com > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Kellen, > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure. I will update the notes with the > > > information. > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Roshani > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 3:01 PM kellen > > > sunderland < > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey Roshani, > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you be able to add 'TensorRT > Runtime > > > > > > > >>> Integration' > > > > > > > >>>> to > > > > > > > >>>>>>> the > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> list > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> of > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> upcoming features? We'll target > getting the > > > > release > > > > > > > >>> in > > > > > > > >>>>>> and > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> polished > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> by > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 23rd. Design proposal is here: > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Runtime+Integration+with+TensorRT > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and the lead contributor is Marek > Kolodziej. > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Kellen > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 8:32 PM Roshani > > Nagmote > > > < > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> roshaninagmo...@gmail.com > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi All, > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am starting the process to prepare > for > > Apache > > > > > > > >>> MXNet > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> (incubating) > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> 1.3 > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Release. Please find project proposal > draft > > for > > > > > > > >> this > > > > > > > >>>>>>> release > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> here: > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <* > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Project+Proposals+for+next+MXNet+Release > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Project+Proposals+for+next+MXNet+Release > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Target feature freeze date is July > 23rd. A > > > > release > > > > > > > >>>>>>> candidate > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> will > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> be > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> cut > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> around Monday, August 6th and voting > will > > > > commence > > > > > > > >>>> from > > > > > > > >>>>>>> then > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> until > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thursday, August 9th. If you have any > > > additional > > > > > > > >>>>>> features > > > > > > > >>>>>>> in > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> progress > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> and > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would like to include it in this > release, > > > please > > > > > > > >>> make > > > > > > > >>>>>> sure > > > > > > > >>>>>>> to > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> comment > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> so > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can update the release notes. > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Feel free to add any other > > > comments/suggestions. > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Roshani > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
