Hi Dom, I verified resnet50 run on MXNet master branch. Checked on single gpu machine. Numbers match. I didn't see any performance degradation. https://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/faq/perf.html#scoring-results
Can you please give me more details on the instance type and script you ran exactly so that I can try to reproduce it again? Thanks, Roshani On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 12:31 PM Roshani Nagmote <[email protected]> wrote: > This is not a major feature. I meant other new feature requests PR won't > be accepted in 1.3 release now. > Bug fixes will be accepted. I will be trying to reproduce the regression > Dom mentioned today. :) > > Thanks, > Roshani > > On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 12:06 PM Naveen Swamy <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Is this is a major feature? This is a regression that Dom is reporting wrt >> to performance >> >> On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 11:38 AM, Roshani Nagmote < >> [email protected] >> > wrote: >> >> > Thanks for reporting this issue Dom. >> > 08/10 (Frida)y was the major feature freeze date. We won't be accepting >> any >> > new features now for MXNet 1.3 release. >> > RC0 will be cut on 08/17(Friday). >> > >> > Will be verifying the performance degradation issue mentioned. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Roshani >> > >> > On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 8:45 AM Divakaruni, Dominic >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > Hi all, We tested resnet50 on MXNet built from master branch on Friday >> > and >> > > were seeing degraded performance on GPU - about 50% slower compared to >> > > these values here https://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/faq/perf.html. >> FWIW >> > > this slowdown was seen for both MXNet as well as the TRT integrated >> > MXNet. >> > > >> > > Something for you all to verify before or after you cut the RC. >> > > >> > > Thx! >> > > >> > > On 8/13/18, 4:34 AM, "kellen sunderland" < >> [email protected]> >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > > Hey Roshani, >> > > >> > > Has a RC branch already been cut? If so, a quick heads up that I >> > think >> > > this commit should probably get into RC0 for 1.3. >> > > >> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/ >> > ee8755a2531b322fec29c9c3d2aa3b8738da41f3 >> > > >> > > It won't cause issues for users, but from a versioning >> compatibility >> > > perspective it's probably better that we remove these functions in >> > this >> > > release. This way we don't have to worry about major bumps in the >> > next >> > > release if they're removed. >> > > >> > > -Kellen >> > > >> > > >> > > On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 7:24 PM Roshani Nagmote < >> > > [email protected]> >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > > > Thanks Kellen and everyone else for working to get TensorRT PR >> > > merged! >> > > > @Sina, I will be keeping track of that issue and fixes to get in >> > the >> > > > release. >> > > > >> > > > We are starting code freeze for 1.3 release today. A release >> > > candidate will >> > > > be cut on 08/17. >> > > > Feel free to add any other comments/suggestions. >> > > > >> > > > Thanks, >> > > > Roshani >> > > > >> > > > On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 5:39 AM kellen sunderland < >> > > > [email protected]> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > All merged and ready to go from my side Roshani (the TensorRT >> > PR). >> > > > > >> > > > > I agree with Sina that issue 12116 looks it's a blocker. I'll >> > try >> > > and >> > > > > reproduce it locally to get another datapoint. >> > > > > >> > > > > On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 3:15 AM Afrooze, Sina < >> > [email protected]> >> > > > wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > > Hi Roshani - I think this regression issue is a release >> > blocker: >> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/12116 - >> Sina >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > On 8/8/18, 12:40 PM, "Roshani Nagmote" < >> > > [email protected]> >> > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Thanks, Kellen for letting me know. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 12:09 PM kellen sunderland < >> > > > > > [email protected]> wrote: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Hey Roshani, I think it should be ready by Friday. >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 7, 2018, 10:20 PM Roshani Nagmote < >> > > > > > [email protected]> >> > > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Thanks Kellen. Yes, we were treating this PR as a >> > release >> > > > > blocker. >> > > > > > Do you >> > > > > > > > have any ETA by which it will be completed? >> Approximate >> > > time >> > > > will >> > > > > > also >> > > > > > > > work. >> > > > > > > > @zhi, Thanks for bringing this PR into notice. I >> will >> > > keep a >> > > > > track >> > > > > > of it. >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > -Roshani >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 11:30 AM Joshua Z. Zhang < >> > > > > > [email protected]> >> > > > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > I strongly suggest to track this PR >> > > > > > > > > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11908 >> > < >> > > > > > > > > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11908 >> > > >> > > in 1.3 >> > > > > > release >> > > > > > > > > which fixed the usability issue for lower end >> > machines >> > > that >> > > > > > don’t have >> > > > > > > as >> > > > > > > > > large shared memory space as ec2 instances. >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Best, >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > - Zhi >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > On Aug 7, 2018, at 9:05 AM, Roshani Nagmote < >> > > > > > > [email protected] >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Hi all, >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Right now, we are delaying MXNet 1.3 release for >> > > pending >> > > > > > TensorRT PR >> > > > > > > ( >> > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/ >> > incubator-mxnet/pull/11325 >> > > ). >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > I wanted to ask everyone for their opinions if >> we >> > > should >> > > > > delay >> > > > > > the >> > > > > > > > > release >> > > > > > > > > > to get tensorRT integration in or we should go >> > ahead >> > > with >> > > > the >> > > > > > release >> > > > > > > > and >> > > > > > > > > > include tensorRT in next release. Please provide >> > > > suggestions. >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Thanks, >> > > > > > > > > > Roshani >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 12:45 AM Hagay Lupesko < >> > > > > > [email protected]> >> > > > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> Some thoughts: why not keep it out of 1.3, and >> > > merge it >> > > > into >> > > > > > master >> > > > > > > so >> > > > > > > > > it >> > > > > > > > > >> can go out with 1.4 instead? >> > > > > > > > > >> Pros: >> > > > > > > > > >> - Reduce quality risks for 1.3 >> > > > > > > > > >> - More time to test and get feedback before >> > release >> > > > > > > > > >> - Avoid further delays in 1.3 release (lots of >> > good >> > > stuff >> > > > > > there >> > > > > > > > already >> > > > > > > > > for >> > > > > > > > > >> users) >> > > > > > > > > >> Cons: >> > > > > > > > > >> - People will need to get master to experiment >> > with >> > > TRT >> > > > (not >> > > > > > a major >> > > > > > > > > issue >> > > > > > > > > >> IMO) >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> Besides, TRT requires a build flag anyway, so >> > MXNet >> > > users >> > > > > > consuming >> > > > > > > > > built >> > > > > > > > > >> packages (PyPi, Scala) will anyway not be able >> to >> > > try it >> > > > out >> > > > > > unless >> > > > > > > > > >> building from source... >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> Thoughts? >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> On Sun, Aug 5, 2018 at 10:38 PM Steffen Rochel >> < >> > > > > > > > [email protected] >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> wrote: >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >>> Marek, Kellen, Jun, Da, Eric, myself and a few >> > > other >> > > > people >> > > > > > > discussed >> > > > > > > > > >>> offline about TensorRT integration PR ( >> > > > > > > > > >>> >> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11325 ). >> > > > We >> > > > > > do >> > > > > > > agree >> > > > > > > > > that >> > > > > > > > > >>> it >> > > > > > > > > >>> would be good to include the PR into upcoming >> 1.3 >> > > > release, >> > > > > > but are >> > > > > > > > all >> > > > > > > > > >>> concerned about the risk involved and the >> > breaking >> > > API >> > > > > > change. The >> > > > > > > > > >>> discussion converged to following proposal. >> (1) >> > > change to >> > > > > > contrib >> > > > > > > PR >> > > > > > > > > and >> > > > > > > > > >>> (2) define a different top level API to >> indicate >> > > that the >> > > > > > package >> > > > > > > is >> > > > > > > > > part >> > > > > > > > > >>> of contrib and experimental (details of API >> TBD >> > > between >> > > > > > Marek, >> > > > > > > Kellen >> > > > > > > > > and >> > > > > > > > > >>> Eric). This change would allow to include TRT >> > > integration >> > > > > > with v1.3 >> > > > > > > > to >> > > > > > > > > >>> enable users to try TRT with MXNet, minimize >> the >> > > risk and >> > > > > > avoid >> > > > > > > > > breaking >> > > > > > > > > >>> API change. >> > > > > > > > > >>> To accommodate the change the request is to >> delay >> > > RC for >> > > > a >> > > > > > few >> > > > > > > days. >> > > > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> Regards, >> > > > > > > > > >>> Steffen >> > > > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 5:08 PM Roshani >> Nagmote < >> > > > > > > > > >> [email protected] >> > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> wrote: >> > > > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>> Hi, >> > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>> I have created a wiki for tracking MXNet 1.3 >> > > release >> > > > with >> > > > > > the >> > > > > > > > > timeline. >> > > > > > > > > >>>> Please take a look here: >> > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/ >> > Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+1.3.0+Release+Status >> > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>> I am still waiting for following 2 PRs to get >> > > merged: >> > > > > > > > > >>>> TRT integration: >> > > > > > > > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11325 >> > > > > > > > > >>>> Gluon RNN: >> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11482 >> > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>> *Code freeze date is 08/02(Thursday).* Kindly >> > try >> > > to >> > > > > > complete >> > > > > > > > ongoing >> > > > > > > > > >>> work >> > > > > > > > > >>>> and get these PRs merged. >> > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>> Thanks, >> > > > > > > > > >>>> Roshani >> > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>> On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 1:02 PM Roshani >> Nagmote >> > < >> > > > > > > > > >>> [email protected] >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>> wrote: >> > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> Hi all, >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> Here is an update on MXNet 1.3 release: >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> I am still waiting for following PRs to get >> > > merged: >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> TRT integration: >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11325 >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> Gluon RNN: >> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11482 >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> Scala examples: >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11753 >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11621 >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> *New code freeze date is: 08/03* Please >> try to >> > > get >> > > > your >> > > > > > ongoing >> > > > > > > > PRs >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> merged by then. >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> @Pedro, I didn't include your PRs in >> tracking >> > > list as >> > > > you >> > > > > > said >> > > > > > > > those >> > > > > > > > > >>> are >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> not critical for now. Please let me know if >> > > those needs >> > > > > to >> > > > > > be >> > > > > > > > > >> included. >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11636 >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11562 >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> I also have updated project proposal cwiki >> page >> > > to >> > > > update >> > > > > > the >> > > > > > > > status >> > > > > > > > > >> of >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> PRs. >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> < >> > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/ >> > Project+Proposals+for+next+MXNet+Release >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> Please let me know if I am missing >> something. >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> Thanks, >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> Roshani >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 1:34 PM Pedro >> Larroy < >> > > > > > > > > >>>> [email protected]> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> wrote: >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> I would like to get these PR merged: >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> >> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11636 >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> >> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11562 >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> How much longer until the code freeze? >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 1:44 AM Roshani >> > Nagmote >> > > < >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> [email protected]> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> wrote: >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Hi all, >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> PRs waiting to be merged for 1.3 release: >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> >> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11325 >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Are there any other PRs waiting to get >> > merged? >> > > Please >> > > > > > let me >> > > > > > > > know. >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Release blocker issue: >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/11853 >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> @Marco, @Kellen, Thanks for bringing up >> the >> > > important >> > > > > > topic. I >> > > > > > > > > >> agree >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> with >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> you and we(internal Amazon team) will be >> > > working on >> > > > > > fixing the >> > > > > > > > > >>>> disabled >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> tests. >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Currently, my colleague, Hao Jin is >> working >> > on >> > > > > compiling >> > > > > > the >> > > > > > > list >> > > > > > > > > >> of >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> disabled tests and leading the effort to >> fix >> > > them in >> > > > > the >> > > > > > next >> > > > > > > few >> > > > > > > > > >>>> days. >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Thanks, >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Roshani >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 6:39 PM kellen >> > > sunderland < >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Thanks again for organizing Roshani. I >> > > believe the >> > > > > > TensorRT >> > > > > > > > > >> work >> > > > > > > > > >>> is >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> ready >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> for a merge. Thanks to Marek and all the >> > > NVIDIA >> > > > > people >> > > > > > for >> > > > > > > > > >>>> iterating >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> on >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> it. If possible could a committer >> review, >> > > make sure >> > > > > it >> > > > > > meets >> > > > > > > > > >>> their >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> expectations and then merge? PR is here: >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11325 >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> To Marco's point. I'd recommend we >> review >> > > some of >> > > > > those >> > > > > > > > > >> disabled >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> tests >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> and >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> see how likely they are to affect users >> > > before we >> > > > cut >> > > > > a >> > > > > > > release. >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Many of >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> them are obviously not too important >> from a >> > > user's >> > > > > > point of >> > > > > > > view >> > > > > > > > > >>>> (e.g. >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> downloading a sometimes-offline image in >> a >> > > test). >> > > > One >> > > > > > idea >> > > > > > > > > >> would >> > > > > > > > > >>> be >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> to >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> try >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> and address as many of the customer >> > impacting >> > > issues >> > > > > as >> > > > > > > possible >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> between >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> code freeze and the RC0 vote. >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 1:23 PM Marco de >> > Abreu >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Hello Roshani, >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> frequent releases are good and I'm >> > > supportive for >> > > > > this >> > > > > > in >> > > > > > > > > >>> general >> > > > > > > > > >>>> in >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> order >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> to provide our users with the latest >> > > features and >> > > > > > > > > >> improvements. >> > > > > > > > > >>>> But >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> at >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> the >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> moment, I'm slightly concerned about the >> > test >> > > > > coverage >> > > > > > due to >> > > > > > > > > >>>> [1]. I >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> want >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> us to be conscious about cutting a >> release >> > > even >> > > > > though >> > > > > > not >> > > > > > > all >> > > > > > > > > >>>> tests >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> are >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> enabled (29 disabled tests [2] as of >> > today). >> > > > > However, I >> > > > > > > > > >>>> acknowledge >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> that >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> we >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> have improved by a lot lately thanks to >> > > everybody >> > > > > > > > > >> participating >> > > > > > > > > >>>> and >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> leading >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> the efforts around improving flaky >> tests. >> > > From a >> > > > > > > retrospective >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> point of >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> view, we could say that these efforts >> have >> > > actually >> > > > > > revealed >> > > > > > > > > >>> some >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> quite >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> interesting bugs and thus the time was >> well >> > > spent >> > > > and >> > > > > > yielded >> > > > > > > > > >>> good >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> results. >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> What does the community think about >> making >> > > another >> > > > > > sprint of >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> improvements >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> around tests followed up by a period of >> 1-2 >> > > weeks >> > > > > > during >> > > > > > > which >> > > > > > > > > >>> we >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> observe >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> the failures closely to ensure that no >> > > critical >> > > > paths >> > > > > > are >> > > > > > > > > >>>> impacted? >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> If >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> we >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> are in a good shape by then, we could >> > > continue the >> > > > > > release >> > > > > > > > > >>> process >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> and >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> at >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> the same time have the advantage of >> giving >> > > > > > contributors more >> > > > > > > > > >>> lead >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> time >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> to >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> finish their work to ensure it gets into >> > the >> > > > release >> > > > > > in the >> > > > > > > > > >>>> desired >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> quality. >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Again, thanks to everybody for their >> > efforts >> > > during >> > > > > > the last >> > > > > > > > > >>> weeks >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> to >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> improve the usability and stability of >> > > MXNet. This >> > > > is >> > > > > > great >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> community >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> effort and a good example of a community >> > > working >> > > > > > together >> > > > > > > > > >>> towards >> > > > > > > > > >>>> a >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> unified >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> goal! >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Best regards, >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Marco >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> [1]: >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d6d81401de796a96677a112d6cd0b0 >> > 74b01f46564194ea89b86c6a3e@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> [2]: >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues?q=is% >> > 3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3A%22Disabled+test%22 >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 8:34 PM Roshani >> > > Nagmote < >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> [email protected] >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Hi all, >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> As mentioned before, code freeze date >> is >> > > today >> > > > July >> > > > > > 23rd. >> > > > > > > > > >>> Please >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> try >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> to >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> get >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> your ongoing PRs merged by today. >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Please let me know if there are any >> > > concerns or >> > > > need >> > > > > > more >> > > > > > > > > >>> time. >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Roshani >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 1:16 PM Anirudh >> > > Acharya < >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> [email protected] >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> @sandeep krishnamurthy < >> > > > > [email protected]> >> > > > > > the >> > > > > > > > > >>> bug >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> fixes >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> in >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> the >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> R-package is something we have just >> > begun, >> > > there >> > > > > > will not >> > > > > > > > > >> be >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> anything >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> significant to announce before the >> v1.3 >> > > code >> > > > > freeze. >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 10:08 PM >> Steffen >> > > Rochel < >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> [email protected] >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> To make it easier to find the >> > discussions >> > > > related >> > > > > to >> > > > > > > > > >>> project >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> proposals >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> I >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> added a column with a link to the >> thread >> > > on dev@ >> > > > > > for >> > > > > > > > > >> most >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> projects. >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Appreciate for the project owners to >> > fill >> > > in the >> > > > > > blanks >> > > > > > > > > >>> and >> > > > > > > > > >>>> to >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> check >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> that I >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> got the right threads. >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Steffen >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 7:11 PM >> Roshani >> > > Nagmote >> > > > < >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Kellen, >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure. I will update the notes with >> the >> > > > > information. >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Roshani >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 3:01 PM >> kellen >> > > > > sunderland < >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey Roshani, >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you be able to add 'TensorRT >> > > Runtime >> > > > > > > > > >>> Integration' >> > > > > > > > > >>>> to >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> the >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> list >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> of >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> upcoming features? We'll target >> > > getting the >> > > > > > release >> > > > > > > > > >>> in >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> and >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> polished >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> by >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 23rd. Design proposal is here: >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/ >> > Runtime+Integration+with+TensorRT >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and the lead contributor is Marek >> > > Kolodziej. >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Kellen >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 8:32 PM >> > Roshani >> > > > Nagmote >> > > > > < >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi All, >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am starting the process to >> prepare >> > > for >> > > > Apache >> > > > > > > > > >>> MXNet >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> (incubating) >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> 1.3 >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Release. Please find project >> proposal >> > > draft >> > > > for >> > > > > > > > > >> this >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> release >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> here: >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <* >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/ >> > Project+Proposals+for+next+MXNet+Release >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/ >> > Project+Proposals+for+next+MXNet+Release >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Target feature freeze date is July >> > > 23rd. A >> > > > > > release >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> candidate >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> will >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> be >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> cut >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> around Monday, August 6th and >> voting >> > > will >> > > > > > commence >> > > > > > > > > >>>> from >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> then >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> until >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thursday, August 9th. If you have >> any >> > > > > additional >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> features >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> in >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> progress >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> and >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would like to include it in this >> > > release, >> > > > > please >> > > > > > > > > >>> make >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> sure >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> to >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> comment >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> so >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can update the release notes. >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Feel free to add any other >> > > > > comments/suggestions. >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Roshani >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> >
