>From my perspective we're developing a few features like mf16c and MKLDNN integration specifically for Intel CPUs. It wouldn't hurt to make sure those changes also run properly on AMD cpus.
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018, 3:38 PM Hao Jin <[email protected] wrote: > I'm a bit confused about why we need extra functionality tests just for AMD > CPUs, aren't AMD CPUs supporting roughly the same instruction sets as the > Intel ones? In the very impossible case that something working on Intel > CPUs being not functioning on AMD CPUs (or vice versa), it would mostly > likely be related to the underlying hardware implementation of the same > ISA, to which we definitely do not have a good solution. So I don't think > performing extra tests on functional aspect of the system on AMD CPUs is > adding any values. > Hao > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 5:50 PM Seth, Manu <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On 11/29/18, 2:39 PM, "Alex Zai" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > What are people's thoughts on having AMD machines tested on the CI? > AMD > > machines are now available on AWS. > > > > Best, > > Alex > > > > > > >
