Hi All, For some more context, these were the last emails I sent on the dev and legal lists requesting help on the open questions –
1. Question on legal about the CC-By-2.5 <http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/201805.mbox/%3CCAK1xzDe6ECToKt_2cTR_7txQQCwHeYfvxXDfmuGgfA3jaTs=j...@mail.gmail.com%3E> 2. Question on dev about googletest file <http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/mxnet-dev/201804.mbox/%3CCAMGgKDC8szdfFqQhhSNpwwT_3zi4LBS7A=u4v7kj4ule44u...@mail.gmail.com%3E> 3. General Request for review of the licenses wiki <https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/mxnet-dev/201801.mbox/%3CCAMGgKDCi=s933zcVWwei15i5uBC1h88VUogt3Br=Vq28=vi...@mail.gmail.com%3E> (Note: You can click on the the “>>” next to the thread on the top right to view the next responses in the email threads in the apache archive. ) Thanks, Meghna Baijal On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 4:30 PM Steffen Rochel <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear MXNet community - > as you should have seen in previous email, voting for v1.4.0.rc0 has been > cancelled. We received a -1 vote due to outstanding license issues. > Please help to update > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/MXNet+Source+Licenses > and > resolve outstanding issues. > > I would like to ask specifically for help from contributors to mkldnn, > opemmp and onnx-tensorrt to address the feedback from Justin - see > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ebb8c4c00fb66dd98da13621c7dcb8753fee57562a861d61379d31e9@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E > . > > I suggest to fix the issues first on master, then cherry-pick and merge to > 1.4.x branch. > > I'm suggesting to exclude Julia from 1.4.0 release as integration into > MXNet repo and upgrade to 0.7+ is WIP. > I'm suggesting to exclude googletest/googlemock from 1.4.0 release as > outstanind license issues are not resolved yet. This should not impact > users. > > Please provide your feedback to the suggestions. > > Regards, > Steffen > > > On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 1:34 PM Steffen Rochel <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Dear MXNet community - > > I hope you have seen that voting for v1.4.0.rc0 has started and will > > continue until December 27th noon. So far two binding +1 votes. > > I suggesting the following schedule to account for holidays and of course > > depending on voting feedback. > > > > Vote on dev@ until 12/27 > > > > Vote on general@ 12/28 – 1/3 > > > > Release announcement with pre-build language bindings 1/9 > > > > > > Please let me know if you have concerns with the proposed schedule. > > > > Regards, > > Steffen > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 11:22 AM Haibin Lin <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> Hi Steffen, > >> > >> Aston and I would like to bring this PR to your attention: > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13686, where Zhi fixed > the > >> num_worker argument of DataLoader on windows. Without this fix, using > >> DataLoader with num_worker > 0 would result in crash on Windows. > Bringing > >> this PR to 1.4.x would greatly benefit windows users of MXNet. Aston is > >> working on the dive into deep learning book > >> <http://diveintodeeplearning.org> based on MXNet, which is due and > frozen > >> for publication next week. Currently the book will depend on MXNet 1.4.0 > >> and discourages readers from using multi-worker DataLoaders due to this > >> bug > >> on Windows. With this fix Aston can update the examples in the book with > >> DataLoader using multiple workers, which will be very beneficial to the > >> broader MXNet community. > >> > >> Best, > >> Haibin > >> > >> On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 6:11 AM Pedro Larroy < > >> [email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Hi Steffen > >> > > >> > Added some notes in your PR for the release notes. > >> > > >> > In particular, I'm a bit concerned about the status of topology aware > >> > communication, since it has open issues and is not being tested in CI. > >> > (The tests also fail). I think we should anounce it when it's working > >> > properly and it's well tested. > >> > > >> > Pedro. > >> > > >> > On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 11:06 AM Steffen Rochel < > >> [email protected]> > >> > wrote: > >> > > > >> > > Dear MXNet community - > >> > > all issues beside one > >> > > <https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/13438> have been > >> > > addressed. I suggest to document the last remaining issue as known > >> > problem > >> > > and move forward with the release. > >> > > Please communicate if you have concerns of know about critical > issues > >> to > >> > be > >> > > addressed before starting vote about releasing 1.4.0 as soon as > >> possible. > >> > > Please also have a look at the release notes > >> > > < > >> > > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+1.4.0+Release+Notes > >> > > > >> > > and provide feedback. > >> > > > >> > > I'm planing to start voting beginning of next week. > >> > > Steffen > >> > > > >> > > On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 8:31 PM Steffen Rochel < > >> [email protected]> > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > Hi Pedro - this are indeed the draft release notes for v1.4.0. > >> Please > >> > add > >> > > > description as you suggested. > >> > > > > >> > > > All - please have a look at the release notes and provide feedback > >> and > >> > > > suggestions.. > >> > > > Steffen > >> > > > On Sun, Dec 9, 2018 at 3:30 AM Zhao, Patric < > [email protected]> > >> > wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > >> Hi Steffen, > >> > > >> > >> > > >> I saw the draft of 1.4 release notes in here ( > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+1.4.0+Release+Notes > >> > > >> ). > >> > > >> > >> > > >> Is this near the final version? I'd like to add some > descriptions > >> of > >> > new > >> > > >> quantization features enabled in 1.4. > >> > > >> > >> > > >> Is it OK? > >> > > >> > >> > > >> Thanks, > >> > > >> > >> > > >> --Patric > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > -----Original Message----- > >> > > >> > From: Steffen Rochel [mailto:[email protected]] > >> > > >> > Sent: Saturday, December 8, 2018 1:12 AM > >> > > >> > To: [email protected] > >> > > >> > Subject: Apache MXNet v1.4.0 release status > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > Dear MXNet community - > >> > > >> > I would like to provide update on v1.4.0 status, details are > >> tracked > >> > > >> here > >> > > >> > < > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+%28i > >> > > >> > ncubating%29+1.4.0+Release+Plan+and+Status> > >> > > >> > . > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > Thank you very much for everybody effort to resolve the > >> identified > >> > > >> issues. > >> > > >> > We are down to 3 open issues - for details please see > >> > > >> > > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+%28in > >> > > >> > cubating%29+1. > >> > > >> > 4.0 > >> > > >> > > >> > +Release+Plan+and+Status#ApacheMXNet(incubating)1.4.0ReleasePlanandSt > >> > > >> > atu > >> > > >> > +Release+Plan+and+s-OpenPRstotrack > >> > > >> > < > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+%28i > >> > > >> > > >> ncubating%29+1.4.0+Release+Plan+and+Status#ApacheMXNet(incubating)1. > >> > > >> > 4.0ReleasePlanandStatus-OpenPRstotrack> > >> > > >> > Please help to resolve the remaining issues and integrate to > >> v1.4.x > >> > > >> branch. > >> > > >> > Current estimate to address the identified security > >> vulnerabilities > >> > in > >> > > >> the > >> > > >> > Scala/Java package and merge into v1.4.x branch is end of next > >> week > >> > > >> > (December 14th) I will communicate as soon I have more > >> information. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > Regards, > >> > > >> > Steffen > >> > > >> > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > >
