+1

Built from source. Verified distributed training of Resnet50 works fine.

On Tue, Feb 19, 2019, 11:43 AM Sheng Zha <zhash...@apache.org wrote:

> -[Y] Are release files in correct location?
> -[Y] Do release files have the word incubating in their name?
> -[Y] Are the digital signature and hashes correct?
> -[Y] Does DISCLAIMER file exist?
> -[Y] Do LICENSE and NOTICE files exists?
> -[Y] Is the LICENSE and NOTICE text correct?
> -[N] Is the NOTICE year correct?
> -[Y] Un-included software dependencies are not mentioned in LICENSE or
> NOTICE? (sz: did not finish checking)
> -[Y] License information is not mentioned in NOTICE?
> Is there any 3rd party code contained inside the release? If so:
> -[Y] Does the software have a compatible license?
> -[Y] Are all software licenses mentioned in LICENSE?
> -[Y] Is the full text of the licenses (or pointers to it) in LICENSE?
> Is any of this code Apache licensed? Do they have NOTICE files? If so:
> -[Y] Have relevant parts of those NOTICE files been added to this NOTICE
> file?
> -[Y] Do all source files have ASF headers?
> -[Y] Do the contents of the release match with what's tagged in version
> control?
> -[N] Are there any unexpected binary files in the release?
> -[Y] Can you compile from source? Are the instruction clear?
>
> +1 with the caveat:
> - NOTICE year was fixed on master but not on the release candidate. rc3
> still reads "2017-2018"
>
> -sz
>
> On 2019/02/19 00:19:52, Roshani Nagmote <roshaninagmo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > +1 Downloaded, installed on Ubuntu 16.04. Verified signatures.
> > Built from source with cuda enabled. Ran train_mnist.py test
> successfully.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Roshani
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 12:13 PM Carin Meier <carinme...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 Downloaded and verified the signature on the tar. Built and tested
> the
> > > Scala/Clojure package
> > >
> > > On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 2:13 PM Qing Lan <lanking...@live.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (binding) on the release. Checked Mac + Linux (Ubuntu 16.04) build
> > > from
> > > > source successfully. Checked Scala build with no errors.
> > > >
> > > > ´╗┐On 2/15/19, 6:08 PM, "Piyush Ghai" <ghai.piy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >     Dear MXNet community,
> > > >
> > > >     I would like to propose a vote to release Apache MXNet
> (incubating)
> > > > version v1.4.0.
> > > >     Voting will start today, Friday February 15th 6pm PST and will
> close
> > > > on Monday,
> > > >     February 18th 6pm PST.
> > > >
> > > >     Link to release notes:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+1.4.0+Release+Notes
> > > > <
> > > >
> > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+(incubating)+1.4.0+Release+Notes
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >     Link to release candidate 1.4.0.rc3:
> > > >      <
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.4.0.rc3/>
> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.4.0.rc3 <
> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.4.0.rc3>/
> > > >
> > > >     Link to source and signatures on apache dist server:
> > > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.4.0.rc3/ <
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.4.0.rc3/>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >     Please remember to TEST first before voting accordingly:
> > > >     +1 = approve
> > > >     +0 = no opinion
> > > >     -1 = disapprove (provide reason)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >     Best regards,
> > > >     Piyush
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to