I use the combined jar for the same reasons as Bruno. sean
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 10:26:13 +0100, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > yes, I would say that, too... > > is there any problem in providing both? > > regards, > > Martin > > On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:59:10 +0100 (CET), Bruno Aranda - Dev > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > In my opinion it is ok to have both alternatives. I use the all-in-one > > because I build from cvs very often and it is easier to replace my *old* > > myfaces.jar... > > > > Bruno > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I got email from Jonas (Oracle) and he asked why we provide > > > myfaces.jar and a standalone version (api, extention, impl, wml) > > > > > > I remember, that we did a split in *old* SF codebase. Craig > > > mentioned splitting them should be cleaner. > > > > > > But now there is again a myfaces.jar and also the > > > standalone version. > > > (http://tinyurl.com/4skb6) > > > > > > Shouldn't we better keep the separate instead a all-in-one > > > JAR? > > > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Matthias > > > > > > > >
