yes, move to SVN as it is and restructure then. also gives us additional time to consider all necessary refactorings ;-) -M
On 4/13/05, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 > > Manfred, are we talking about moving to SVN *before* restructuring? > If so that makes sense. The move should be made easier b/c we have no > branches (just one we made for tree2 but never used.) Also, James > Mitchell has offered to help advise us on the move (he is familiar > with SVN from his work on Struts.) > > On 4/13/05, Heath Borders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +1. I've been using it on WSAD w/o integrated support for about a year now, > > and its really not that painful. > > > > > > > > On 4/13/05, David Heffelfinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > I'm not sure if non committers are allowed to vote, count it if we are, > > > feel free to ignore if we are not. > > > > > > David > > > > > > > > > > > > On 4/13/05, Sylvain Vieujot <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 10:19 +0200, Manfred Geiler wrote: > > > > Final release 1.0.9beta is only a question of hours now. After > > > > publication will be the best time to finally move our repository out > > > > > > > > > > > > of the incubator. > > > > We have already discussed and voted about the SVN issue, but there are > > > > some new and changed circumstances and I would like to find out if > > > > > > > > > > > > there are still committers who have serious objection against SVN. > > > > Cons: > > > > - IntelliJ users still do not have integrated SVN support. > > > > > > > > Pros: > > > > - SVN is the new repository technology for ASF. At the long term all > > > > Apache projects should have moved to SVN. So it's unwritten common > > > > > > > > sense that new top level projects should start with SVN from the > > > > beginning. > > > > - As you know, SVN is able to keep history for renamed and moved files > > > > > > > > and dirs. Just now we are discussing some serious structural changes > > > > (subprojects, sandbox, etc.) If we do that now in CVS we would loose > > > > > > > > > > > > valuable history for many files. > > > > - TortoiseSVN is a powerful alternative for all IntelliJ users in the > > meantime. > > > > > > > > So here is my definite > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 for switching from CVS to Subversion > > > > > > > > -Manfred > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > -Heath Borders-Wing > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
