+1
Stan Silvert JBoss, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] callto://stansilvert > -----Original Message----- > From: Manfred Geiler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 4:20 AM > To: MyFaces Development > Subject: [vote] Switch to Subversion > > Final release 1.0.9beta is only a question of hours now. After > publication will be the best time to finally move our repository out > of the incubator. > We have already discussed and voted about the SVN issue, but there are > some new and changed circumstances and I would like to find out if > there are still committers who have serious objection against SVN. > Cons: > - IntelliJ users still do not have integrated SVN support. > Pros: > - SVN is the new repository technology for ASF. At the long term all > Apache projects should have moved to SVN. So it's unwritten common > sense that new top level projects should start with SVN from the > beginning. > - As you know, SVN is able to keep history for renamed and moved files > and dirs. Just now we are discussing some serious structural changes > (subprojects, sandbox, etc.) If we do that now in CVS we would loose > valuable history for many files. > - TortoiseSVN is a powerful alternative for all IntelliJ users in the > meantime. > > So here is my definite > +1 for switching from CVS to Subversion > > -Manfred
