What about the 1.2 changes that do not conflict with 1.1? For example, encryption of the client-side state. Does it make sense to implement those features now as long as they don't interfere with the 1.1 TCK? That one in particular I have been thinking about for a while so I was glad to see it added to the spec.
sean On 4/18/05, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 4/18/05, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > With the 1.2 spec nearing finalization what are the plans for TCK? > > Would we try to certify MyFaces against 1.1 or 1.2? If we are going > > for 1.2 that is a ways off but on the other hand, we could start > > thinking about implementing some of the stuff in 1.2 that is also > > going to be implemented in the RI version. > > > > As there hasn't been any implementation work on the 1.2 changes yet, > I'd certainly recommend going for 1.1 certification in the short term. > That would be what people are using today. > > Craig >
