Sorry, I was responding to Manfred. I think i came in on the middel of a conversation without knowing the context ;-) my bad :D.
"Does svn make a diff and some kind of optimization during the final commit? Otherwise we would always have a new repository version for every single file regardless if it was really changed or not." I was simply saying that the change is maintained on the commit. It is not maintained based on the number of files that have changed. So, if you changed 20 files, deleted 10 and replaced 4 the overall version number would only increment by 1 if you perform it in 1 commit. Brandon On 5/13/05, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Brandon, > > I take it you are saying you should not svn delete and svn add over > and over again? If so, I agree with you. My plan was to do a regular > delete and then commit. TortoiseSVN seems to allow this bug svnant > does not. So I am stuck. > > Anyone have a suggestion on how I can do this easily in Ant? > Obviously one could write scripts, etc. but I'm looking to do it in > Ant if possible. > > sean > > > On 5/13/05, Brandon Goodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This is how SVN functions. It strongly recommends against trying to > > subvert this functionality. SVN works on the idea that 1 change to the > > repository is a change to the whole repository. You CAN diff your > > repository and see changes on various levels. So, you can see what has > > changed and get a report the same as CVS. I'd recommend that you read > > the SVN manual. http://svnbook.red-bean.com/ > > > > Brandon > > > > On 5/13/05, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Does svn make a diff and some kind of optimization during the final > > > commit? > > > Otherwise we would always have a new repository version for every > > > single file regardless if it was really changed or not. > > > -Manfred > > > > > > 2005/5/13, Bruno Aranda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > Yes, Sean, this is how it should be. You first svn delete all HTMLs and > > > > then > > > > regenerate them and svn add the new files. If you then check the status > > > > of > > > > the svn, it will tell you that all regenerated files are 'replaced' or > > > > 'added', depending if they existed before, and the not regenerated > > > > files are > > > > marked with 'delete'. After the commit, you will have only the > > > > regenerated > > > > files in the repository. > > > > > > > > Bruno > > > > > > > > > > > > 2005/5/13, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > Manfred, > > > > > > > > > > I too seem to recall that forrest has a clean command but I don't > > > > > think that will help with the javadoc and tlddoc (unless there are > > > > > comparable commands for those.) > > > > > > > > > > Bruno, > > > > > > > > > > The delete command would be fine but we don't know in advance which > > > > > files are to be deleted. Ex. We remove a class file and so we no > > > > > longer want the corresponding HTML file in the javadoc. Are you > > > > > saying that deleting the files with svn delete and then regenerating > > > > > them will only result in an svn delete for the files that were not > > > > > replaced? > > > > > > > > > > sean > > > > > > > > > > On 5/13/05, Bruno Aranda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I think you should first mark the files as 'deleted' with the svn > > > > > > delete > > > > > > command, then, these files will be deleted automatically on > > > > > > commit... > > > > > > > > > > > > Bruno > > > > > > > > > > > > 2005/5/13, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > If I remember right, there is already a forrest "clean" target > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > empties the site build dir. > > > > > > > -Manfred > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2005/5/13, Sean Schofield < [EMAIL PROTECTED] >: > > > > > > > > I double-checked and realized that Forrest was *not* deleting > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > defunct files. So next I will try having ant remove all of the > > > > > > > > website files (*.html, etc.) and then generate them all over > > > > > > > > again. > > > > > > > > I'll then see if the defunct files are automatically removed on > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > commit. Regular commit is working fine so I have high hopes :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sean > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/12/05, Martin Cooper < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 12 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Never mind. I got it working so I don't need the distro. > > > > > > > > > > One > > > > quick > > > > > > > > > > question though. Have you ever used ant and svn to "delete" > > > > files > > > > > > > > > > that were already checked in. We're rebuilding our website > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > so > > > > > > > > > > files need to be removed if the javadoc changes etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, I haven't tried delete. I've only used checkout and > > > > > > > > > update. It > > > > > > should > > > > > > > > > "just work", though. ;-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > Martin Cooper > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sean > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> Are you using javahl as well? I couldn't get a binary > > > > > > > > > >>> version > > > > of > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > >>> jar and the build file from the source had several issues > > > > > > (including > > > > > > > > > >>> lacking a jar command.) I moved to jsvn after reading > > > > something > > > > > > on > > > > > > > > > >>> the subversion site about jsvn being the most complete > > > > > > > > > >>> java > > > > svn > > > > > > > > > >>> implementation. > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> The distro I picked up has a svnjavahl.dll in it, yes. I > > > > > > > > > >> don't > > > > > > recall > > > > > > > > > >> where I got the binaries from, but I picked up "svnant > > > > 0.9.13.zip" > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > >> somewhere. I can send it to you off-list if you want. > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> -- > > > > > > > > > >> Martin Cooper > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> I think I have it working now but I'm doing a few more > > > > > > > > > >>> tests. > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> sean > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote: > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> OK. I have SVN working at my office now. Next step is > > > > > > > > > >>>>> to > > > > check > > > > > > into > > > > > > > > > >>>>> SVN and Ant. Anyone have any experience with using SVN > > > > > > > > > >>>>> with > > > > > > Ant? > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Looks like I need to hunt around for a custom task > > > > > > > > > >>>>> since its > > > > not > > > > > > part > > > > > > > > > >>>>> of the core or optional tasks. > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> I use SvnAnt, which works just fine. > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> http://subclipse.tigris.org/svnant.html > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> -- > > > > > > > > > >>>> Martin Cooper > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> sean > > > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> On 5/3/05, Sean Schofield < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> First I will try to get SVN working for nightly build. > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> The > > > > > > infra > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> people at my work have still not figured out how to > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> open > > > > the > > > > > > firewall > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> for SVN (Grrrrr.) I need to get that resolved ASAP. > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Then > > > > I > > > > > > will fix > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> the build script. > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> I haven't had a chance to look at Manfred's website > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> build > > > > > > procedure. > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> I will investigate that next and look into automating > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> that > > > > plus > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> javadoc. > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> sean > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> On 5/3/05, Manfred Geiler < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> ok, I added the javadoc and tlddoc creation to > > > > build-site.xml > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> so, on site creation those dirs are updated > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> automatically. > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> did also a "svn up" on minotaur, but mirrors have not > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> been > > > > > > synced yet. > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> -Manfred > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> 2005/5/3, Manfred Geiler < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> tldoc and javadoc on homepage are currently broken. > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Will > > > > try > > > > > > to upload > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> them again ASAP. > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> I think it was my fault, because I cleaned up the > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> website > > > > dir > > > > > > last > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> time before I checked it out from SVN. So I will add > > > > tldoc > > > > > > and javadoc > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> to the site in SVN, so that this cannot happen again > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> in > > > > the > > > > > > future. > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Sean, is it possible to add the doc creation and > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> upload > > > > to > > > > > > the nightly build? > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> The following steps would be great: > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> * automatically build docs in ${ > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> project.dir}/../site > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> * SVN commit it automatically > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> * sftp it to minotaur > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> -Manfred > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> 2005/5/3, Grant Smith < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> We probably now need to urgently update the nightly > > > > build > > > > > > script to send > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> everything to Subversion instead of CVS. > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Sean ? :) > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
