+1 for renaming the nightly version to 1.0.x when the time has come (Sean's suggestion)
+1 for keeping the name "Nighly Build" - in fact it will be fixed in this nightly's build, so there should not be too many misconceptions. regards, Martin On 5/20/05, Oliver Rossmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sean Schofield wrote: > > >Manfred, > > > >If we're going to use the 1.0.10 version in JIRA here is what I > >suggest. Find any issue that is currently marked with that version > >and change to nightly (there shouldn't be many since you just added > >it.) > > > Sean, > > actually it was me who created the 1.0.10 entry. > > >Then edit the versions and rename nightly to 1.0.10. This way > >all of the issues marked nightly will be changed to 1.0.10 without > >adding a log entry in JIRA and sending new emails. > > > >Either we have a Nightly and change later (like I was suggesting) or > >we abandon Nightly and have just 1.0.10. I'm ok with dropping nightly > >if you and Oliver feel that this is the way to go but we have to fix > >it now so we don't have to manually change all of the ones marked > >"nightly" later on down the road. Better to manually fix the one or > >two marked 1.0.10 then the dozens marked nightly. > > > > > I was not aware it is possible to rename a version in Jira. If it works > that way I'm fine with using the scheme you suggested. But shouldn't we > rename "Nighly Build" to "Upcoming release" then to avoid any doubts a > user might have about the meaning of "Fixed in Nightly Build" ? > > Oliver > > >sean > > > > > > > -- > Oliver Rossmueller > Software Engineer and IT-Consultant > Hamburg, Germany > http://www.rossmueller.com > >
