Re: MyFaces Reorg

[Grant Smith]

Sounds reasonable. However, just to be clear... Will new components start off in the sandbox, then get promoted to tomahawk, and then finally to myfaces ? I guess I don't understand the need for the intermediate step. +1 for myfaces-all.jar, although I don't think it should contain sandbox components (which is I think what everyone else is saying). You mentioned SVN changes / reorg. Would that be a new repository ? If so, do we need to request that from the infrastructure people, or can we do it ourselves ? Sean Schofield wrote: Actually I forgot to mention my idea for sandbox. I think we should have a separate jar file for the sandbox (myfaces-sandbox.jar) It would have the necessary share code + sandbox specifcic TLD + its own javadoc. My thinking is that we have a sandbox bundle but that we never formally release it (since its just a sandbox.) So you can build from source or get a nightly sandbox-05272005.tar.gz. So us MyFaces developers who use MyFaces implementation (instead of RI) would have two jar files in our path: myfaces-all.jar and myfaces-sandbox.jar What do you think? sean On 5/27/05, Sylvain Vieujot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +1 on myfaces-all.jar too. Maybe it should include the future sandbox's files too. So maybe a myfaces.jar, same as we have today, and a myfaces-all.jar that will also includes the sandbox files. Sylvain. On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 11:32 +0200, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: +1 on myfaces-all.jar ;) On 5/27/05, Bruno Aranda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I agree with Martin that the jar with all the stuff is very useful, at least for me that I update the jar very often. With only one jar I can discard that I have done a mistake deploying the jars when an exception or error is thrown. My 2 euro cents... Bruno 2005/5/27, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I would still supply a catch-it-all you get it all jar file. It's just so much easier, and there are many frameworks supplying something like that. To avoid confusion, we should name it: myfaces-all.jar though, I think! regards, Martin On 5/27/05, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Can someone please elaborate on what the "shared" code contains and why it is in "quotes"? :-) This refers to the code currently in the trunk under src/share. It refers to code that is used in both the implentation as well as the custom components. John Fallows. sean .