On 5/27/05, Grant Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sounds reasonable. However, just to be clear... Will new components start > off in the sandbox, then get promoted to tomahawk, and then finally to > myfaces ? I guess I don't understand the need for the intermediate step.
No. Just sandbox to tomahawk. Tomahawk will be a myfaces subproject so in that sense the components will be part of myfaces but the idea is to distinguish myfaces implementation from components + goodies. > +1 for myfaces-all.jar, although I don't think it should contain sandbox > components (which is I think what everyone else is saying). I agree with you. > You mentioned SVN changes / reorg. Would that be a new repository ? If so, > do we need to request that from the infrastructure people, or can we do it > ourselves ? Not sure if we'll need infra help but basically we'll need to create subrprojects etc and move stuff around. Most of this I suspect can be done by the PMC. Once we get agreement on the jarfiles I will propose a svn restructure that we can debate. I'll also get some feedback from the Struts team who have plenty of experience in this area. James Mitchell and Martin Cooper have both offered help and ideas on this in the past so when the time comes we'll try and pull them into the discussion. Just to be clear, no new repository would be created. Just shuffling of existing stuff. sean
