Manfrd it uses org.apache.myfaces.webapp.webxml.ServletMapping; org.apache.myfaces.webapp.webxml.WebXml;
-Matthias On 7/6/05, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 for making tomahawk 100% RI compliant > > BUT > -1 for removing Tiles support - definitely! > > Reason: > * Tiles support is one of the key features of MyFaces > * Tiles support should not (and "is not" AFAIK) RI incompatible > > Where does it use MyFaces impl stuff? The special > JspTilesViewHandlerImpl does not extend any specific base class and > uses delegation pattern. The only two references to > org.apache.myfaces.* are shared classes, so where is the problem? > > -Manfred > > > 2005/7/6, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > This proposal might be a bit controversial... > > > > I think we should make everything in tomahawk 100% RI compliant and > > remove anything that is not. We've made (eroneous) claims in the past > > that the stuff in the old components.jar will work with the RI but > > there are several exceptions. I think we can get broader > > usage/acceptance of the tomahawk stuff if we can legitimately claim > > that it works with any implementation. > > > > Rather than dumping everything that does not currently work with the > > RI, I recommend we move it to the sandbox and perhaps resurrect it > > when we have the time/interest. There are a few components that have > > minor RI quirks that I think we can leave in tomahawk but address them > > ASAP. Other components/extensions have outright dependencies on the > > myfaces implementation. > > > > One major component that should be moved out of tomahawk (IMO) is > > tiles. Let me start by saying that I like the Tiles stuff and it is > > one thing that attracted me to MyFaces. But it requires the MyFaces > > implementation (uses some view controller stuff.) We could refactor > > it but I am not volunteering for that. If someone else is prepared to > > refactor then I say leave it in tomahawk an refactor. If not, lets > > move it to sandbox. > > > > David Geary (Tiles guru) just checked in some JSF Tiles support into > > the Shale project. If we dropped Tiles from tomahawk (and sandbox) > > that might not be the end of the world. > > > > There are other components as well that are not RI compliant. We > > should make a list and figure out what we want to do with them. At a > > *minimum* we should list the stuff in tomahawk that does *not* work > > with the RI and publicize that list. > > > > sean > > > -- Matthias Wessendorf
