Yes, I think the website would not need to be checked in. +1
regards, Martin On 7/6/05, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I know you are probably tired of my proposals by now ;-) ... but there > is more work to be done. > > We should remove the stuff from myfaces/site from SVN. This is the > *transformed* HTML and IMO it doesn't really belong in SVN (for the > same reasons we discussed on the earlier lib thread.) > > For those who aren't famliar with the website build procedure we use > forrest to build the HTML (forrest docs should remain in SVN > obviously). Then the HTML is checked into SVN. Then a chron script > on minotaur does a SVN update to pull down the updated files. > > I could give a long list of reasons why this is a PITA but I'm > thinking most people will probably agree. In the interim I'm thinking > we build a tarball, scp to minotaur, remove existing website, replace > with new tarball. All done by ant. Eventually we can move it to > Maven but I think the Maven investigation/debate will take some time > to resolve. > > sean >
