Sorry, that was the answer to the other proposal ;-) For the JavaDoc stuff, le'ts hear what Craig can tell us...
Bruno 2005/7/21, Bruno Aranda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > +1 > > For me it is better to introduce a new dependency if we can create > better tests (and faster) than using nasty workarounds... > > Bruno > > 2005/7/21, Bill Dudney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi All, > > > > Is there an issue with copying the javadoc from the spec classes? I > > remember someone said we could not use the jsf-api.jar file a long > > time ago but the java doc is part of the spec. We should be able to > > copy that correct? So I'd like to propose that as I'm adding tests to > > the javax.faces.* packages that I also add javadoc to these classes. > > > > Thoughts? > > > > TTFN, > > > > -bd- > > >
