I do not agree with that... style is always important, wether this is good or not is another question ;)
(Ruby on Rails partially thrives on style, e.g.)
regards,
Martin
On 7/29/05, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What do you mean by "rough?" Is it a matter of style or functionality
that is missing? For the simple examples I would say style is not
important.
On 7/28/05, Grant Smith < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Changing my vote to +1 for the new release. The simple examples look a
> little "rough around the edges", but that's no big deal. Thanks to
> Mathias for resolving the datatable issue!
>
>
>
> Grant Smith wrote:
>
> > -1 for a new release until HtmlDataTable works again (see my question
> > in the dev list). I unfortunately am swamped at the moment so I don't
> > have time to delve into it.
> >
> > .
> >
>
>
