0.5 After all that time using the 'x', changing to 't' is a big change as we all have got used to 'x'. The massive replace is needed, and existing production applications could change progressively from 'x' to 't' as the prefix is defined in each page. I do agree that it is more natural to use the 't' now that the components+extensions subproject it is called tomahawk and for new users the 't' might be more understandable than an x. Also, what Dennis points out has been said some times in the past and it is not the first time the 'x' debate is started.... Maybe for the sandbox we could use a 2 or 3-letter prefix, such as 'sx' (then the 'x' would have more sense for the Xtensions) or 'sbx'. Or maybe 'ts' (tomahawk sandbox)...
Regards, Bruno 2005/8/2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > From a user's perspective, I felt slightly jilted by the 'x' because that is > what I and everyone else have always used for the JSTL XML taglib - which is > pretty popular, and to my knowledge, "claimed it" first. > > Dennis Byrne >
