regards,
Martin
On 8/3/05, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hadn't thought about that part ... that might cause a lot of
headaches, especially with users who don't realize its changed. I'm
changing my vote to 0 for Matthias' idea but still +1 for changing the
name as Bruno suggested.
On 8/3/05, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> another (reluctant) +1
>
> cause all users have to change their JSP-files with that, just changing the
> prefix doesn't do any harm.
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
>
> On 8/3/05, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > +1 for Matthias' suggestion as well
> >
> > On 8/3/05, Bruno Aranda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > +1 to the 'also' :-) I think we should change to tomahawk wherever it
> > > is needed...
> > >
> > > Bruno
> > >
> > > 2005/8/3, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > also
> > > >
> > > > <uri> http://myfaces.apache.org/extensions</uri>
> > > >
> > > > to
> > > >
> > > > http://myfaces.apache.org/tomahawk ?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 8/3/05, Matthias Wessendorf < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > On 8/2/05, Sean Schofield < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > I was thinking that also. +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 8/2/05, Bruno Aranda < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > Now that we are adjusting names to tomahawk, should'nt also the
> > > > > > > myfaces_ext.tld file change to tomahawk.tld?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Bruno
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
