you might be right that the license is compatible - I was assuming that not, but after reading through, it seems to be possible. I am not good enough in English to really find the subtle differences, though.
Maybe we should go ask our experts here at the ASF about this particular issue?
regards,
Martin
On 8/10/05, Jacob Hookom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes I remember, what licensing were you looking for Facelets? If you've
been following the licensing threads related to CDDL, the issue isn't
CDDL, it's Sun's contribution and copyright assignment-- which Facelets
is NOT under.
Is there something in particular that you are looking for from the license?
-- Jacob
Martin Marinschek wrote:
> Hi Jacob,
>
> I suspect that it might be the license issue - you remember, we
> discussed that?
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> On 8/9/05, *Matthias Wessendorf* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
> FYI
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Jacob Hookom <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
> Date: Aug 9, 2005 3:07 PM
> Subject: Shale Tapestry Integration
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> Hi Gary,
>
> I'm wondering why Shale doesn't just look at using Facelets
> instead of
> trying to integrate a parser from a completely different
> framework? It
> is already JSF-centric with more templating features than
> Tapestry. On
> top of that, Facelets uses the new EL API to properly handle EL
> variable
> management-- better than the next version of JSP (2.1) for tree
> creation.
>
> Home Page:
> https://facelets.dev.java.net/
>
> Documentation:
> https://facelets.dev.java.net/nonav/docs/dev/docbook.html
>
> Sample Error Page:
> https://facelets.dev.java.net/nonav/docs/dev/error.html
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jacob
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
>
--
Jacob Hookom - Minneapolis
--------------------------
http://hookom.blogspot.com
