Stan Silvert wrote:
Go ahead and enter the feature request in jira.  We can discuss/capture
the details there.

Filed MYFACES-434, and attached the patch.
As described in it, for the patch, tomahawk depends on impl.
So, it needs your suggestion.

Regards,
 shinsuke

Stan Silvert
JBoss, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
callto://stansilvert


-----Original Message-----
From: Shinsuke SUGAYA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 6:17 PM
To: MyFaces Development
Subject: Re: build order for MyFaces Portlet

Stan Silvert wrote:

What is there now should be fine.  MyFacesGenericPortlet belongs

with

impl.  It is no different from MyFacesServlet in that regard.

The problem is that the JSF spec never got around to defining

JSFPortlet

the way they did FacesServlet.  They defined the functionality, but

not

name of the Portlet.  I'll try to see that this is addressed in JSF

2.0

if I am still on the EG next time around.

Good! I agree with you.


In the mean time, I think the solution is to use delegation instead

of

inheritance.  I will change the MyFacesGenericPortlet to define plug
points.  Then tomahawk can contain the needed plugins without

extending

MyFacesGenericPortlet.  Then there will be no dependency.

Come to think of it, that is probably a cleaner solution anyway.  I

hate

inheritance.

Do you follow me Shinsuke?

Yes.
I would like to know more details to update my suggestion :)

Regards,
 shinsuke


Stan Silvert
JBoss, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
callto://stansilvert



-----Original Message-----
From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 5:39 PM
To: MyFaces Development
Subject: Re: build order for MyFaces Portlet

Tomahawk should work with either the RI or MyFaces.  So if there is

a

dependency in the portlet stuff on MyFaces impl that needs to be

added

to JIRA and then fixed.  I haven't been following the portlet stuff
but if its possible to move something our of impl and into the

"share"

subproject, that might be a solution.

sean



It is OK for tomahawk to reference the base impl, but it is not OK

for


impl to reference tomahawk.

I just reread my post and realized that the above may not be

correct.


It might be that tomahawk can only reference the JSF API and not

impl.


Hmm.  Now I think I see your dilemma.

Can anyone give an authoritative answer about tomahawk?



Stan



Regards,
shinsuke



Stan Silvert
JBoss, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
callto://stansilvert




-----Original Message-----
From: Shinsuke SUGAYA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 9:48 AM
To: Stan Silvert
Subject: build order for MyFaces Portlet

Hi Stan,

I'm working on MyFaces' portlet.
For build order, I encountered the issue.
I would like to use AddResource in impl/ directory, but
AddResource class is in tomahawk. Therefore, I could not
build impl jar... Do you have any idea? My suggestion is
to create a new directory(ex. portlet) and move files for
the portlet. So, myfaces-portlet.jar is created. What do
you think?

Regards,
shinsuke

__________________________________
Save the earth
http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/ondanka/


__________________________________
Save the earth
http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/ondanka/


__________________________________
Save the earth
http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/ondanka/




__________________________________
Save the earth
http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/ondanka/

Reply via email to