Bill, please go ahead and check in what you have got now. If you do it anytime during the next hour, I will go ahead and prepare a new release from this so that we get this faces-config problem out of the world as fast as possible!
regards, Martin On 9/22/05, Bill Dudney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have a lot of other changes related to the cactus/cargo stuff. > > I don't have a problem checking in all that but there has not been > much discussion about it yet. I'd rather see some discussion happen > before I check in the rest of the changes. > > TTFN, > > -bd- > > On Sep 22, 2005, at 1:38 PM, Mike Kienenberger wrote: > > > It's got to be checked into the trunk at some point. I don't see any > > advantages in waiting. > > > > On 9/22/05, Bill Dudney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> OTOH, I could checkin everything including the cactus & cargo changes > >> and that would fix things on the trunk. > >> > >> Thoughts? > >> > >> -bd- > >> > >> On Sep 22, 2005, at 1:25 PM, Bill Dudney wrote: > >> > >> > >>> No I've not checked it in yet because I'm waiting for discussion on > >>> the idea of making a 1_1_0 branch that we could do the emergency > >>> release from. > >>> > >>> TTNF, > >>> > >>> -bd- > >>> > >>> On Sep 22, 2005, at 1:20 PM, Mike Kienenberger wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>> Is this supposed to be fixed in svn? > >>>> > >>>> I just did a complete checkout about an hour ago, and built it with > >>>> "ant dist-all" and I'm getting the error below if I use myfaces- > >>>> all, > >>>> but not if I use myfaces.api, myfaces.impl, and tomahawk > >>>> separately. > >>>> > >>>> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/myfaces/config/ > >>>> FacesConfigurator > >>>> at > >>>> org.apache.myfaces.webapp.StartupServletContextListener.initFaces > >>>> (StartupServletContextListener.java:63) > >>>> at > >>>> org.apache.myfaces.webapp.StartupServletContextListener.contextInit > >>>> ia > >>>> lized(StartupServletContextListener.java:46) > >>>> > >>>> Or is this a case of the cure being worse than the disease? > >>>> > >>>> -Mike > >>>> > >>>> On 9/22/05, Bill Dudney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> Since this is simply a build problem perhaps we could copy the tag > >>>>> 1_1_0 to a branch and update only the build.xml file then build a > >>>>> new > >>>>> release. > >>>>> > >>>>> This would be simple, quick and more or less safe. > >>>>> > >>>>> Would we have to rerun the TCK? As long as we trust our tag it > >>>>> should > >>>>> be fine. Correct? > >>>>> > >>>>> TTFN, > >>>>> > >>>>> -bd- > >>>>> > >>>>> On Sep 22, 2005, at 12:08 PM, Werner Punz wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> Bruno Aranda wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> This is causing many troubles to users now as we can see from > >>>>>>> questions in the list. > >>>>>>> faces-config.xml is not included in the build because of > >>>>>>> MYFACES-598, > >>>>>>> when passing -Dskip.sandbox to the build process the file is not > >>>>>>> included. I think this is important enough and we should do > >>>>>>> something > >>>>>>> about this. I don't know if it is possible to include the file > >>>>>>> in the > >>>>>>> current release but I don't think it is good to development to > >>>>>>> touch > >>>>>>> an already released thing. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> My opinion here is that we should release a maintenance release > >>>>>>> 1.1.1 > >>>>>>> as soon as possible. Waiting for thoughts on this. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Regards, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Bruno > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> I cannot vote yet, but due to the fact that many newbys probably > >>>>>> will try to use the > >>>>>> new release, due to the non beta status and TCK status, and this > >>>>>> is really a showstopper for many, I´d say get the fix > >>>>>> out ASAP! > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Trainings in English and German
