Remember to release without the sandbox. In theory you should use 'ant
-Dskip.sandbox=true dist-all', but that is the origin of the bug. I
cannot look at it right now...

Bruno

2005/9/23, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Bill,
>
> please go ahead and check in what you have got now. If you do it
> anytime during the next hour, I will go ahead and prepare a new
> release from this so that we get this faces-config problem out of the
> world as fast as possible!
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> On 9/22/05, Bill Dudney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have a lot of other changes related to the cactus/cargo stuff.
> >
> > I don't have a problem checking in all that but there has not been
> > much discussion about it yet. I'd rather see some discussion happen
> > before I check in the rest of the changes.
> >
> > TTFN,
> >
> > -bd-
> >
> > On Sep 22, 2005, at 1:38 PM, Mike Kienenberger wrote:
> >
> > > It's got to be checked into the trunk at some point.  I don't see any
> > > advantages in waiting.
> > >
> > > On 9/22/05, Bill Dudney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> OTOH, I could checkin everything including the cactus & cargo changes
> > >> and that would fix things on the trunk.
> > >>
> > >> Thoughts?
> > >>
> > >> -bd-
> > >>
> > >> On Sep 22, 2005, at 1:25 PM, Bill Dudney wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>> No I've not checked it in yet because I'm waiting for discussion on
> > >>> the idea of making a 1_1_0 branch that we could do the emergency
> > >>> release from.
> > >>>
> > >>> TTNF,
> > >>>
> > >>> -bd-
> > >>>
> > >>> On Sep 22, 2005, at 1:20 PM, Mike Kienenberger wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>> Is this supposed to be fixed in svn?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I just did a complete checkout about an hour ago, and built it with
> > >>>> "ant dist-all" and I'm getting the error below if I use myfaces-
> > >>>> all,
> > >>>> but not if I use myfaces.api, myfaces.impl, and tomahawk
> > >>>> separately.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/myfaces/config/
> > >>>> FacesConfigurator
> > >>>>     at
> > >>>> org.apache.myfaces.webapp.StartupServletContextListener.initFaces
> > >>>> (StartupServletContextListener.java:63)
> > >>>>     at
> > >>>> org.apache.myfaces.webapp.StartupServletContextListener.contextInit
> > >>>> ia
> > >>>> lized(StartupServletContextListener.java:46)
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Or is this a case of the cure being worse than the disease?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> -Mike
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On 9/22/05, Bill Dudney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Since this is simply a build problem perhaps we could copy the tag
> > >>>>> 1_1_0 to a branch and update only the build.xml file then build a
> > >>>>> new
> > >>>>> release.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> This would be simple, quick and more or less safe.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Would we have to rerun the TCK? As long as we trust our tag it
> > >>>>> should
> > >>>>> be fine. Correct?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> TTFN,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> -bd-
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Sep 22, 2005, at 12:08 PM, Werner Punz wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Bruno Aranda wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> This is causing many troubles to users now as we can see from
> > >>>>>>> questions in the list.
> > >>>>>>> faces-config.xml is not included in the build because of
> > >>>>>>> MYFACES-598,
> > >>>>>>> when passing -Dskip.sandbox to the build process the file is not
> > >>>>>>> included. I think this is important enough and we should do
> > >>>>>>> something
> > >>>>>>> about this. I don't know if it is possible to include the file
> > >>>>>>> in the
> > >>>>>>> current release but I don't think it is good to development to
> > >>>>>>> touch
> > >>>>>>> an already released thing.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> My opinion here is that we should release a maintenance release
> > >>>>>>> 1.1.1
> > >>>>>>> as soon as possible. Waiting for thoughts on this.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Regards,
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Bruno
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I cannot vote yet, but due to the fact that many newbys probably
> > >>>>>> will try to use the
> > >>>>>> new release, due to the non beta status and TCK status,  and this
> > >>>>>> is really a showstopper for many, I´d say get the fix
> > >>>>>> out ASAP!
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> http://www.irian.at
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Trainings in English and German
>

Reply via email to