We have been discussing doing a release as the problem with the faces-config.xml missing in the myfaces-all.jar is a very prominent one ;)
If there is a way of fixing the existing release with just the faces-config.xml file, that would be better! regards, Martin On 9/23/05, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > as long as 1_1_0 is ok to change (by convention tags are not > > modified, only branches). > > Technically you can change it but SVN (at least Tortoise SVN) warns > you and says its a tag and you shouldn't. Why do we need a branch at > this point? > > We could create a branch for it but lets establish why this is necessary > first. > > > > All I'm looking for is a place to change the release only enough to > > get the faces-config.xml file in place (as well as the other missing > > bits because that file is not found) and then get a new release > > pushed out. > > > > Martin M is planning on doing another release from the trunk after I > > finish my commit. That is fine but risky. > > We're doing a release? I haven't read every message on the dev list > but I must have missed this discussion. What is the motivation for > this? > > > TTFN, > > > > -bd- > > sean > > > On Sep 23, 2005, at 5:53 AM, Sean Schofield wrote: > > > > > -1 > > > > > > Note that after I tagged the 1.1 release I created a external in the > > > "release" dir so if you use > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/release/1_1_0/ you will get > > > "current" but for the release. It doesn't include sandbox so its not > > > quite the same but sandbox is not part of the official release. > > > > > > Doesn't this give you what you need? > > > > > > sean > > > > > > On 9/23/05, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> I agree with Martin on this - if you need everything, you can always > > >> checkout MyFaces, right? > > >> > > >> regards, > > >> > > >> Martin > > >> > > >> On 9/23/05, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On Thu, 22 Sep 2005, Bill Dudney wrote: > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>> Well the idea is that people would then be using current/trunk > > >>>> to checkout > > >>>> instead of just current. > > >>>> > > >>> > > >>> But by definition, what's in branches and tags is not current, so > > >>> why does > > >>> it make sense to include them under 'current'? The structure you > > >>> described > > >>> is exactly what you have without using the 'current' external in > > >>> the first > > >>> place, isn't it? > > >>> > > >>> -- > > >>> Martin Cooper > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>> TTFN, > > >>>> > > >>>> -bd- > > >>>> > > >>>> On Sep 22, 2005, at 12:31 PM, Martin Cooper wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Thu, 22 Sep 2005, Bill Dudney wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> Hi All, > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> I'd like to propose that we change current to be; > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> current > > >>>>>> /branches > > >>>>>> /tags > > >>>>>> /trunk > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Still all externals but tracking the group of tags & branches > > >>>>>> that are > > >>>>>> common across all the subprojects. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> current/trunk -> becomes what we currently call current > > >>>>>> current/branches -> currently empty > > >>>>>> current/tags -> 1_1_0 with externals to each subproject's > > >>>>>> 1_1_0 tag > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> I would recommend against doing that. It would mean that > > >>>>> everyone checking > > >>>>> out 'current' would end up with multiple copies of the entire > > >>>>> source tree, > > >>>>> which is unlikely to be something that they would want. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Most people are unlikely to want more than one version of the > > >>>>> source at any > > >>>>> given time, so I don't see a need to clump together multiple > > >>>>> versions in a > > >>>>> single checkout. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> -- > > >>>>> Martin Cooper > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> To fix the faces-config.xml bug that's been identified in the > > >>>>>> 1_1_0 > > >>>>>> release we can create a branch in current/branches/1_1_0 that > > >>>>>> uses > > >>>>>> externals to the tags for everything but 'build' which would > > >>>>>> point to the > > >>>>>> 1_1_0 branch in build (not yet created but I'd be glad to do > > >>>>>> that). > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Thoughts? > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> TTFN, > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> -bd- > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> > > >> http://www.irian.at > > >> Your JSF powerhouse - > > >> JSF Trainings in English and German > > >> > > > > > > > > -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Trainings in English and German
