Well, there is nothing to argue against quicker release cycles. EXCEPT the fact that a new release (not a build!) does not emerge alone, ie. cannot be fully automated. There are things like release candidate voting, testing (!), release notes, homepage updates, announcements. Which takes time. Sean and Bill have spent much much time in releasing so far (thanks!) and many have helped to make it as easy as possible. But of course: Any additional help is welcome! The more volunteer helpers and testers we have, the faster we can have our cycles.
As Howard did mention, a release plan would be good. Any volunteer who is willing to look over the open Jira issues and classify them? Any thoughts about future milestones? -0.5 from my side for releasing the API/impl separately: There is no need IMHO. API/Impl are the most important parts. So, if there really is a showstopper, this alone would legitimate a new release. Regardless of small bugs in one of the addons or sub projects. Thoughts? Thanks, Manfred 2005/11/20, Travis Reeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > +1 for the quicker release cycle. > > Travis > > On 11/20/05, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Not sure about the release plan, but +1 for a quicker release cycle. > > Let's not get caught up in the same slow cycle that has affected > > Struts for so long. > > > > > > > > -- > > James Mitchell > > 678.910.8017 > > Skpe: jmitchtx > > > > > > > > On Nov 19, 2005, at 11:19 PM, Abrams, Howard A wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there a release plan for 1.1.2? It seems there are a significant > > > number of issues on the trunk; some of which may not be marked as > > > such in JIRA. > > > > > > > > > > > > Also, now that we've gotten passed the TCK, moved to SVN, and > > > broken out the various sub projects, I'd like to revisit the > > > subject of releasing the API/impl separately from the components. > > > There are many of us who do not use any of the sub projects, so it > > > seems silly to hold back a release of the impl due to a bug in some > > > random fancy component. Any +1's out there? > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > h. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
