> > At the time of the original discussion, we
> proposed better ways of
> > handling this which should be archived in the
> mailing list. (I think
> > Martin and Craig were also involved at the time,
> and we hammered out a
> > reasonable dependency-handling approach). I'm not
> really sure why Ed
> > went with it the way he did because no one else
> was happy with that
> > approach.
As I said previously, I just put this in the Sun impl
because we had a short term need for a deterministic
approach to loadine META-INF/faces-config.xml files.
I agree it's not the best approach but you must agree
that it is unobtrusive. I only intend it to be used
in a pinch, anyway.
Ed
__________________________________________
Yahoo! DSL Something to write home about.
Just $16.99/mo. or less.
dsl.yahoo.com
