Definitely. We basically decided that a long time ago. We just haven't done a release like this yet (but that will change.)
So do you like the revised proposal (as far as layout goes?) Sean On 1/5/06, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1/5/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > True. The one issue to be aware of is when commons changes. If > > containers ship with an older version of MyFaces (including the > > commons jar) there could be conflicts. No big deal though. We just > > make sure to remind people to upgrade commons if they are downloading > > the "tomahawk only" release. (We should probably include the > > commons.jar in the tomahawk release as well.) > > Another "sooner rather than later" task we should complete is to make > the build process package commons separately for impl and for > tomahawk. Then we don't have to worry about conflicts. > > We don't want to force a new release of impl just because we've added > extra functionality to commons. >
