I kind of like it just as tomahawk.jar. Its easier to pronounce and doesn't get confused with myfaces implementation. We don't want our users to assume that they need the MyFaces implementation. That's my reasoning for keeping it the way it is. I'm open to changing it if the other commiters agree with you.
Sean On 1/7/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > @Sean, Bernd: sounds good. Let's go with that! My project setup in > intellij is automatically generated anyways ;) > > One final comment: If it's not done already - let's also change the > name for tomahawk to myfaces-tomahawk... > > all other modules have that prefix already in place. > > regards, > > Martin > > On 1/7/06, Bernd Bohmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Sean Schofield schrieb: > > > Quick question: > > > > > > Do we have to name it: myfaces/core/trunk/myfaces-api/pom.xml in order > > > for the module to be called myfaces-api? I would prefer just api ... > > > > > It should be myfaces-api and myfaces-impl. Please look at the maven svn > > structure. > > > > > -- > > http://www.irian.at > > Your JSF powerhouse - > JSF Consulting, Development and > Courses in English and German > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces >
