Dustin, how about adding it to 516? I'll point out again that I think there's already a working phase listener for this situation attached to issue 403.
On 1/10/06, Dustin Bruzenak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I know this issue has been closed, but I figured I'd attach an actual > working PhaseListener for those of us who want to move forward temporarily > with this approach. My example was afflicted with a few bugs that I've now > tested and fixed. Unfortunately, that issue is closed. Where should I stick > the update? > > Thanks, > Dustin >
