> Servlet = bad idea needs an additional entry in the web.xml > (and just check how many problems the tomahawk extension filter > already causes) > The obvious place probably would be the extension filter (which has to > be there anyway) > or a phase listener - which would be even better because that one > would not need any entry at all from the users side if packed correctly.
yeah! right. so, instead of servlet let's take a PhaseListener. But we definitly need (or should provide) a facility to populate your backing beans, instead of doing parameter catching inside of that bean. that was my message :-) -Matthias
