I don't know, but I suspect it'd break the TCK. 1.2 corrected the 1.1 design flaw, so I'm guessing it's required in 1.1.
On 2/8/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does it require API changes or would it break the TCK if we would go > "1.2" compatible here? > > regards, > > Martin > > On 2/8/06, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 1/31/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > By the way - any update on the optional validator stuff together with > > > partial validation? Ok, maybe we should start a different thread on > > > this ;) > > > > I finally got around to updating the wiki page. > > > > The short answer is that it works fine as long as you're also using > > facelets. It should also work if you're using JSF 1.2. It can't > > work with standard JSF 1.1 component tree building rules. > > > > ================================================= > > Known issues > > > > * JSF 1.1 recreates validators and converters each request. This > > makes it difficult (maybe impossible) to implement a validator element > > that wraps other validator elements. Thus, you must also use facelets > > with JSF 1.1 in order to use the optional validation framework. > > > > > -- > > http://www.irian.at > > Your JSF powerhouse - > JSF Consulting, Development and > Courses in English and German > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces >
