BTW, it appears i did not commit the test last night or the fix today. I just committed both to the branch.
Sean On 4/12/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok so this is how things work outside of unit tests. I am committing > a fix that I think should work for the unit test (and TCK) and still > leave the existing functionality the way it is (which is presumably > good b/c we've heard no complaints on this.) > > Sean > > On 4/12/06, Dennis Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > MyFaces looks for a parameter called jsf_sequence . Do a few post backs on > > any form page in the example app and you'll see this incremented. This is > > how the impl keeps track of which view to associate w/ each > > > > IF YOU KNOW ANYTHING MORE ON THIS, HELP. > > > > Dennis Byrne > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > >From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 11:58 AM > > >To: 'MyFaces Development' > > >Subject: Re: [IMPORTANT] Major blocker issue: MYFACES-1281 > > > > > >Still waiting for some help on this issue. Come on MyFaces committers > > >lets get this one figured out. You don't need the TCK to fix this. > > >Just make the unit test work and help explain how it works (if it ever > > >worked) in the standard non-unit test case. > > > > > >Sean > > > > > >On 4/11/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> There is an outstanding issue that is preventing us from passing the > > >> TCK. Without this we cannot release a JSF 1.1 certified release. We > > >> could use everyone's help in tracking this down and resolving ASAP. > > >> We need to get on with the 1.1.2 release. > > >> > > >> Sean > > >> > > >> ps. More frequent releases should help reduce the number of suprise > > >> TCK failures per release. Also more unit tests will be helpful here. > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
