> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 12:33 PM
> To: MyFaces Development
> Subject: Re: JSF 1.2: branch, wiki, maven repo, ...
> 
> My preference would be to focus on the backwards compatible changes
> first and to save the branch for as late as possible.  Have we
> identified any of these types of changes (I know that client side
> state encryption is already done.)
> 

I think it makes sense to work on both at the same time.  I've already
worked on at least one JSF 1.2 feature where it wasn't readily apparent
that it could be added to JSF 1.1 until later.  So, some things can be
worked out on the branch before we decide that they are OK to merge with
the trunk.

We have several developers who want to start on JSF 1.2 features.  We
just need a place to check in code so we can work together.

I can set up a temporary repository at JBoss for that if we have to, but
it seems that it would be simpler to just create a branch for MyFaces.

> Are the Tomcat6 jars intended for compile purposes only at this point?

JSF 1.2 relies on APIs found in JSP 2.1.  So you will also need these
APIs at run time but they will be provided by a Servlet 1.5/JSP 2.1
container such as Tomcat 6.

> 
> Sean
> 
> On 4/18/06, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > As you know, Stan is currently working hard on the next generation
> MyFaces
> > Stuff aka JSF 1.2.
> > I would like to give you some infos about an offline conversation we
had
> a
> > few hours ago.
> >  * We decided to create a branch of the current myfaces core trunk -
> let's
> > call it "jsf12" or "jsr-252"
> >  * All important infos will be tracked at
> > http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/JSR-252 . The page is
> > currently maintained by Stan, but feel free to add your ideas,
issues,
> > comments, etc.
> >  * Stan will speak to Tomcat guys to get green light for adding the
> needed
> > Tomcat-6 jars into the apache snapshot repo at
> > http://cvs.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository/ . This way
> > we could have a working maven build although Tomcat-6 jars are not
maven
> > published yet.
> >  * Everything that is somehow (backwards) compatible to JSF 1.1
stuff
> and
> > does not break jsr-127 TCK will go to the trunk, so that we can keep
the
> > branched stuff at a minimum.
> >
> > Any thoughts or vetos?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Manfred
> >
> >

Reply via email to