I think it would make a great component and a great SoC project. Sean, you want to mentor someone?
regards, Martin On 4/20/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Paging is fine for some things but at times it seems excessive. In > our system we have a wizard where the user needs to assign a person to > a document. When you show the full 2000 users in the system its much > slower then before we went to JSF. > > IMO the user shouldn't see a noticeably slower GUI b/c we've switched > to JSF. Paging is a PITA in this case. I know the name I want, so > why can't I sort by last name and scroll down to it (and do it fast?) > Paging sucks in this example. > > Of course, this is just MO. > > Sean > > > On 4/19/06, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sean Schofield schrieb: > > >> So, +1 for a SoC project on this component; but for sean it may come too > > >> late :) > > > > > > Yes too late for now but I could use it in the future. I can think of > > > many situations where this would be helpful. IE 6.0 adds to the > > > already slow process. It only takes 500 + rows with a few columns of > > > components and things get noticeably slower then without JSF. > > > > > Sean, I am not sure if a dynamic scroller really eases the burden that > > much, it looks cool, but thats it, in my opinion a real paginable data > > model on top of the already existing jsf table is the better option, way > > less burden on the server and in the end I think the response speed and > > is way better and the load on the server way less. > > > > If you simply only load one page per time or do 5-6 chached pages the > > results especially with an underlying db which allows proper pagination > > (most do nowadays) are way better. > > > > > -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
