Well, I invested like a day in the beginning - and then 2 hours per week per project.
You can invest more, sure - or less, the question is if the project will work out then. I also had to help the students with the administrative stuff, which was not too easy last year, but it will be better this year, I've heard. regards, Martin On 4/20/06, Dennis Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How much of a time commitment is this Martin? I am curious. > > Dennis Byrne > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Martin Marinschek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 01:55 AM > >To: 'MyFaces Development' > >Subject: Re: Ideas, Ideas! > > > >I think it would make a great component and a great SoC project. Sean, > >you want to mentor someone? > > > >regards, > > > >Martin > > > >On 4/20/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Paging is fine for some things but at times it seems excessive. In > >> our system we have a wizard where the user needs to assign a person to > >> a document. When you show the full 2000 users in the system its much > >> slower then before we went to JSF. > >> > >> IMO the user shouldn't see a noticeably slower GUI b/c we've switched > >> to JSF. Paging is a PITA in this case. I know the name I want, so > >> why can't I sort by last name and scroll down to it (and do it fast?) > >> Paging sucks in this example. > >> > >> Of course, this is just MO. > >> > >> Sean > >> > >> > >> On 4/19/06, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > Sean Schofield schrieb: > >> > >> So, +1 for a SoC project on this component; but for sean it may come > >> > >> too late :) > >> > > > >> > > Yes too late for now but I could use it in the future. I can think of > >> > > many situations where this would be helpful. IE 6.0 adds to the > >> > > already slow process. It only takes 500 + rows with a few columns of > >> > > components and things get noticeably slower then without JSF. > >> > > > >> > Sean, I am not sure if a dynamic scroller really eases the burden that > >> > much, it looks cool, but thats it, in my opinion a real paginable data > >> > model on top of the already existing jsf table is the better option, way > >> > less burden on the server and in the end I think the response speed and > >> > is way better and the load on the server way less. > >> > > >> > If you simply only load one page per time or do 5-6 chached pages the > >> > results especially with an underlying db which allows proper pagination > >> > (most do nowadays) are way better. > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >-- > > > >http://www.irian.at > > > >Your JSF powerhouse - > >JSF Consulting, Development and > >Courses in English and German > > > >Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > > > > > -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
