That's my understanding as well. Stan Silvert JBoss, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] callto://stansilvert
> -----Original Message----- > From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 3:10 PM > To: MyFaces Development > Subject: Re: Portlet/Tomahawk bugs [was RE: JSF 1.2: branch, wiki, maven > repo, ...] > > So we're talking a new JIRA category and *not* a new maven artifact > right? If so then +1. > > Sean > > On 4/24/06, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hey Stan, > > > > Are you willing to cycle through each of the portlet issues and > > reclassify each one? (either as a core portlets component bug or move > > it to a tomahawk bug (either portlet component or whatever else is > > relevent?) > > > > The query I used was > > > > Project: MyFaces Core > > > > Issue Type: Bug > > > > Components: No Component, General, JSR-127 > > > > Resolutions: Unresolved > > > > (basically I pulled up the MYFaces-core tracker, selected > > "outstanding" issues, and narrowed down the issue type and components > > involved.) > > > > At some point I should look through the other 42 issues and see why > > they're not bugs. I suspect most of the remaining stuff is > > misclassified. > > > > If you want, I will add JIRA portlet components for Core or Tomahawk. > > Just let me know. > > > > > > On 4/24/06, Stan Silvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Mike Kienenberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 11:37 AM > > > > To: MyFaces Development > > > > Subject: Re: JSF 1.2: branch, wiki, maven repo, ... > > > > > > > > On 4/24/06, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > It looks like we have 75 unresolved bugs filed against core, but > > > those > > > > > with a vested interest in having them fixed will eventually submit > > > > > patches. > > > > > > > > I've knocked this down to 65 bugs after moving issue to Tomahawk and > > > > reclassification. > > > > I noticed there were a number of portlet issues in there. Should we > > > > consider these separate? Perhaps create a portlet component for > core? > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > I think that's a pretty good idea. Portlet bugs don't affect TCK and > > > they should only hold up a release if they are really severe. > > > > > > Most of these are there because of integration problems between > > > "standard" JSF Portlets and Tomahawk. Now that Tomahawk is its own > > > project it is more unclear which project should be responsible for the > > > fix. It may be that we need a TomahawkMyFacesPortlet that adds the > > > extra stuff needed to support these components. > > > > > > Unfortunately, I'll have to keep these issues on the back burner for > > > awhile longer - at least until JSF 1.2 is done. If any other > committer > > > wants to take them over, be my guest. > > > > > > Stan Silvert > > > JBoss, Inc. > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > callto://stansilvert > > > > >
