> If you want, I will add JIRA portlet components for Core or Tomahawk.
> Just let me know.

For now you can just add new "portlet" component for core.  It will just
take a moment to go through and change them.  Just let me know when that
is done.

Stan Silvert
JBoss, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
callto://stansilvert

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Kienenberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 3:03 PM
> To: MyFaces Development
> Subject: Re: Portlet/Tomahawk bugs [was RE: JSF 1.2: branch, wiki,
maven
> repo, ...]
> 
> Hey Stan,
> 
> Are you willing to cycle through each of the portlet issues and
> reclassify each one?  (either as a core portlets component bug or move
> it to a tomahawk bug (either portlet component or whatever else is
> relevent?)
> 
> The query I used was
> 
> Project: MyFaces Core
> 
> Issue Type: Bug
> 
> Components:  No Component, General, JSR-127
> 
> Resolutions:  Unresolved
> 
> (basically I pulled up the MYFaces-core tracker, selected
> "outstanding" issues, and narrowed down the issue type and components
> involved.)
> 
> At some point I should look through the other 42 issues and see why
> they're not bugs.  I suspect most of the remaining stuff is
> misclassified.
> 
> If you want, I will add JIRA portlet components for Core or Tomahawk.
> Just let me know.
> 
> 
> On 4/24/06, Stan Silvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Mike Kienenberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 11:37 AM
> > > To: MyFaces Development
> > > Subject: Re: JSF 1.2: branch, wiki, maven repo, ...
> > >
> > > On 4/24/06, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > It looks like we have 75 unresolved bugs filed against core, but
> > those
> > > > with a vested interest in having them fixed will eventually
submit
> > > > patches.
> > >
> > > I've knocked this down to 65 bugs after moving issue to Tomahawk
and
> > > reclassification.
> > > I noticed there were a number of portlet issues in there.  Should
we
> > > consider these separate?  Perhaps create a portlet component for
core?
> >
> > +1
> >
> > I think that's a pretty good idea.  Portlet bugs don't affect TCK
and
> > they should only hold up a release if they are really severe.
> >
> > Most of these are there because of integration problems between
> > "standard" JSF Portlets and Tomahawk.  Now that Tomahawk is its own
> > project it is more unclear which project should be responsible for
the
> > fix.  It may be that we need a TomahawkMyFacesPortlet that adds the
> > extra stuff needed to support these components.
> >
> > Unfortunately, I'll have to keep these issues on the back burner for
> > awhile longer - at least until JSF 1.2 is done.  If any other
committer
> > wants to take them over, be my guest.
> >
> > Stan Silvert
> > JBoss, Inc.
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > callto://stansilvert
> >

Reply via email to