I don't see any reason why you couldn't do that. We have people today who remove MyFaces so they can use the RI.
Stan Silvert JBoss, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] callto://stansilvert > -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Marinschek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 4:16 AM > To: MyFaces Development > Subject: Re: Cancelled: JavaOne MyFaces Committers/Contributors meeting > > Stan, > > will it be possible to configure another JSF 1.2 implementation in > JBoss, when the release is out? Meaning - will it be possible to put > the RI out and MyFaces (in a 1.2 compatible version) in, if that is > desired by the user? > > regards, > > Martin > > On 5/10/06, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Dennis Byrne schrieb: > > >> Also, JBoss has decided to use the RI instead of MyFaces for JBoss 5. > > >> The decision was purely one of time and resources. By shipping the > RI > > >> we will be able to pass the JEE 5 TCK sooner. > > > > > > We need to branch for 1.2 and get moving. > > > > > Btw. if anyone has not noticed yet, Craig pointed out at JAX a huge > > "political" issue with JSF 1.2 > > > > As of JEE 5 the webcontainers are not allowed in their classloader > > hierarchy to make the jsf implementation overridable via a WEB-INF/lib > > jsf (as far as I understood, Craig correct me there if I am wrong). > > > > So it will become way harder to push a new jsf implementation into a > > webapp as soon as an application moves from a plain servlet runner > > towards Tomcat. > > > > > > Werner > > > > > > > > > -- > > http://www.irian.at > > Your JSF powerhouse - > JSF Consulting, Development and > Courses in English and German > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
