I just placed tomahawk 1.1.3 in with core 1.1.3 . I found that each formless commandLink threw an exception. I have not been following the tomahawk stuff as closely as I should - I take it this was done in order to increase inter-operability?
If this is the plan, I think there are going to be a lot of confused developers - even if the release announcement and the MyFaces home page warns about this. Remember how many messages there were even after Martin had specifically mentioned the last tomahawk release could not be used with the older versions of MyFaces? I don't want to hold up the tomahawk release, but I actually think a better logging would be needed here. It is especially difficult to track this down when the logs tell you to find the control _idJsp0 . Can we give the path to component, as well as a suggestion to change h:commandLink to t:commandLink ? Dennis Byrne >-----Original Message----- >From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Monday, June 5, 2006 02:25 PM >To: 'Dennis Byrne' >Subject: Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release > >I'm uploading one to the nightly build dir right now. Remember its >version 1.1.3 that we are about to release. > >Sean > >On 6/5/06, Dennis Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> No chance of getting a jar out there? I can test for a few hours at work >> today. Large application with lots of tomahawk goodness. >> >> Dennis Byrne >> >> Yes, I forgot to build it this weekend and bring it to work. >> >> >-----Original Message----- >> >From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >Sent: Monday, June 5, 2006 10:06 AM >> >To: 'MyFaces Development' >> >Subject: Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release >> > >> >Can we look at TOMAHAWK-458 and close the door on this release? >> > >> >Sean >> > >> >On 6/2/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> I verified that two of the issues are also present in the 1.1.2 >> >> release so I don't consider these showstoppers. Anyone disagree? >> >> >> >> That leaves one last bug. TOMAHAWK-458. Can folks take a quick look >> >> at this one. >> >> >> >> Sean >> >> >> >> On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > Jira issue created. >> >> > Will give RI tomorrow / friday a more detailed try! >> >> > >> >> > -Matthias >> >> > >> >> > On 5/31/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > > Matthias, >> >> > > >> >> > > Can you add a few JIRA issues with fix version as 1.1.3-SNAPSHOT. >> >> > > That will allow us to keep track of the outstanding issues. >> >> > > >> >> > > Sean >> >> > > >> >> > > On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > > > RI makes some trouble with this build of Tomahawk. >> >> > > > >> >> > > > -Some links are not working (sortable table for instance) >> >> > > > -Some links I must trigger twice to get a *result* (scrolling >> >> > > > through a table) >> >> > > > -Some exceptions on the jsf page (instead of rendered output) >> >> > > > -forceId,jsp makes troubles >> >> > > > duplicated IDs >> >> > > > commandLink id=button inside form id=forceIdForm >> >> > > > commandButton id=button inside form id=dataTable >> >> > > > >> >> > > > both are forceId=true >> >> > > > >> >> > > > for me it should be fine, since their jsf client id is >> >> > > > a)forceIdForm:button >> >> > > > b)dataTable:button >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > but not all components are making problems >> >> > > > -fileupload or tree2 are working fine. >> >> > > > >> >> > > > -Matthias >> >> > > > >> >> > > > On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > > > > Just check the updated brunch. >> >> > > > > Now the *rc* looks good to me! >> >> > > > > Each sample works w/ MyFaces as JSF runtime. >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > Will give it a try w/ RI as JSF runtime >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > -Matthias >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > On 5/30/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > > > > > Patch has been applied. Can we do a little more basic testing >> >> > > > > > on >> >> > > > > > this? I will try to finish up the release process and start a >> >> > > > > > vote >> >> > > > > > thread tomorrow. We should have some basic testing first >> >> > > > > > though in >> >> > > > > > order that we not have any embarassing mistakes like the one >> >> > > > > > Matthias >> >> > > > > > found. >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Sean >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > On 5/30/06, Catalin Kormos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > > > > > > Thanks, i'm glad to be here :) >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > Sure, i'll prepare a patch and send it to you, i don't have >> >> > > > > > > commit rights >> >> > > > > > > yet. >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > Regards, >> >> > > > > > > Catalin >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > Catalin, >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > Welcome to the team. >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > Your dummy form explanation is probably correct. Someone >> >> > > > > > > added a >> >> > > > > > > bunch of tags to many of the examples but probably not all. >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > Can you add them to the tomahawk branch? If you can't commit >> >> > > > > > > yet just >> >> > > > > > > send me the patch. >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > Regards, >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > Sean >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > On 5/30/06, Catalin Kormos wrote: >> >> > > > > > > > I tested also those pages with the latest from SVN, a first >> >> > > > > > > > problem is >> >> > > > > > > that >> >> > > > > > > > they are missing an enclosing . Maybe now this a problem, >> >> > > > > > > > cause the >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > dummy form is no more added? not sure though. >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > Regards, >> >> > > > > > > > Catalin >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > Sean Schofield wrote: @Matthias: Thanks for >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > testing >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > @Everyone: Any ideas on these? >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > Sean >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > On 5/29/06, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: >> >> > > > > > > > > mvn install for tomahawk 1_1_3 worked for me. >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > Installed the simple example war. >> >> > > > > > > > > Some "pages" causing trouble: >> >> > > > > > > > > -sortTable.jsf (not working; click on a link has no efect) >> >> > > > > > > > > -sortAutoTable.jsf (same) >> >> > > > > > > > > -pagedSortTable.jsf (clicking on the scroller icons has >> >> > > > > > > > > no effect, >> >> > > > > > > > > when you click first time. >> >> > > > > > > > > summary: for navigation to next page (after page has >> >> > > > > > > > > rendered first >> >> > > > > > > > > time) it needs two clicks. after that each click goes to >> >> > > > > > > > > the next >> >> > > > > > > > > page, as expected) >> >> > > > > > > > > same for upload example too >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > Tree2 is working fine >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > -Matthias >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > -Matthias >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > On 5/26/06, Sean Schofield wrote: >> >> > > > > > > > > > I made a tomahawk 1_1_3 branch but its not compiling at >> >> > > > > > > > > > the moment. >> >> > > > > > > > > > The references to jsf api and impl are 1.1.3-SNAPSHOT >> >> > > > > > > > > > since 1.1.3 is >> >> > > > > > > > > > not in ibiblio yet (we need to take care of that btw.) >> >> > > > > > > > > > I will change >> >> > > > > > > > > > them before the official release. That shouldn't make a >> >> > > > > > > > > > difference >> >> > > > > > > > > > though. >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > I'm going to be offline for the weekend. Can some >> >> > > > > > > > > > people take a look >> >> > > > > > > > > > at this over the weekend and do some basic testing? >> >> > > > > > > > > > Just do a mvn >> >> > > > > > > > > > install after checking out the branch (no RC yet.) >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > Sean >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > -- >> >> > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf >> >> > > > > > > > > Aechterhoek 18 >> >> > > > > > > > > 48282 Emsdetten >> >> > > > > > > > > http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf >> >> > > > > > > > > mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > --------------------------------- >> >> > > > > > > > How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low >> >> > > > > > > > PC-to-Phone call >> >> > > > > > > > rates. >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > ________________________________ >> >> > > > > > > Do you Yahoo!? >> >> > > > > > > Get on board. You're invited to try the new Yahoo! Mail Beta. >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > -- >> >> > > > > Matthias Wessendorf >> >> > > > > Aechterhoek 18 >> >> > > > > 48282 Emsdetten >> >> > > > > http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf >> >> > > > > mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > -- >> >> > > > Matthias Wessendorf >> >> > > > Aechterhoek 18 >> >> > > > 48282 Emsdetten >> >> > > > http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf >> >> > > > mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > Matthias Wessendorf >> >> > Aechterhoek 18 >> >> > 48282 Emsdetten >> >> > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf >> >> > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >
