Never mind. I see that you committed to the shared trunk. I merged it
up to the branch for you.
Sean
On 6/7/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Right but it will be recompiled into tomahawk via maven. You checked
> it into the shared branch right?
>
> Sean
>
> On 6/6/06, Dennis Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The logging stuff actually was in shared though.
> >
> > Dennis Byrne
> >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >Sent: Tuesday, June 6, 2006 11:02 PM
> > >To: 'MyFaces Development'
> > >Subject: Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release
> > >
> > >OK so you will check your fix into the trunk then? The current
1.1.3
> > >snapshot isn't technically the release candidate because of the
> > >logging changes that Dennis made. I'll put together the official
> > >release candidate tomorrow (Wednesday.)
> > >
> > >Sean
> > >
> > >On 6/6/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> I figured out that treeTable's links aren't working, when using RI
> > >> But to me no showstopper.
> > >>
> > >> So let's use 1.1.3-Snapshot as a RC
> > >>
> > >> -Matthias
> > >>
> > >> On 6/5/06, Dennis Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> > The logging was actually in shared BTW.
> > >> >
> > >> > Dennis Byrne
> > >> >
> > >> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >> > >From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> > >Sent: Monday, June 5, 2006 11:18 PM
> > >> > >To: 'MyFaces Development'
> > >> > >Subject: Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release
> > >> > >
> > >> > >OK so once Dennis adds his logging stuff I will start the
release.
> > >> > >Thanks for the help. You are a MyFaces animal these days.
Glad to
> > >> > >have you back on full time!
> > >> > >
> > >> > >Sean
> > >> > >
> > >> > >On 6/5/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> > >> Sean-
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> TOMAHAWK-458 works now for me...
> > >> > >> I can't reproduce. May be I did something wrong during my
last testing.
> > >> > >> For tomahawk 1.1.2 release I also tested against RI and
the scroller worked
> > >> > >> there for me.
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> I go ahead and close this issue.
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> -Matthias
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> On 6/5/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> > >> > Yes, Ill give it a try this evening (PST).
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > -Matthias
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > On 6/5/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> > >> > > Can we look at TOMAHAWK-458 and close the door on this
release?
> > >> > >> > >
> > >> > >> > > Sean
> > >> > >> > >
> > >> > >> > > On 6/2/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > >> > >> > > > I verified that two of the issues are also present
in the 1.1.2
> > >> > >> > > > release so I don't consider these showstoppers.
Anyone disagree?
> > >> > >> > > >
> > >> > >> > > > That leaves one last bug. TOMAHAWK-458. Can folks
take a quick look
> > >> > >> > > > at this one.
> > >> > >> > > >
> > >> > >> > > > Sean
> > >> > >> > > >
> > >> > >> > > > On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > >> > >> > > > > Jira issue created.
> > >> > >> > > > > Will give RI tomorrow / friday a more detailed try!
> > >> > >> > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > -Matthias
> > >> > >> > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > On 5/31/06, Sean Schofield
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> > >> > > > > > Matthias,
> > >> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > Can you add a few JIRA issues with fix version
as 1.1.3-SNAPSHOT.
> > >> > >> > > > > > That will allow us to keep track of the
outstanding issues.
> > >> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > Sean
> > >> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> > >> > > > > > > RI makes some trouble with this build of
Tomahawk.
> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > -Some links are not working (sortable table
for instance)
> > >> > >> > > > > > > -Some links I must trigger twice to get a
*result* (scrolling through a table)
> > >> > >> > > > > > > -Some exceptions on the jsf page (instead of
rendered output)
> > >> > >> > > > > > > -forceId,jsp makes troubles
> > >> > >> > > > > > > duplicated IDs
> > >> > >> > > > > > > commandLink id=button inside form
id=forceIdForm
> > >> > >> > > > > > > commandButton id=button inside form
id=dataTable
> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > both are forceId=true
> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > for me it should be fine, since their jsf
client id is
> > >> > >> > > > > > > a)forceIdForm:button
> > >> > >> > > > > > > b)dataTable:button
> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > but not all components are making problems
> > >> > >> > > > > > > -fileupload or tree2 are working fine.
> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > -Matthias
> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > Just check the updated brunch.
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > Now the *rc* looks good to me!
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > Each sample works w/ MyFaces as JSF runtime.
> > >> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > Will give it a try w/ RI as JSF runtime
> > >> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > >> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > On 5/30/06, Sean Schofield
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > Patch has been applied. Can we do a
little more basic testing on
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > this? I will try to finish up the release
process and start a vote
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > thread tomorrow. We should have some
basic testing first though in
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > order that we not have any embarassing
mistakes like the one Matthias
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > found.
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > Sean
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > On 5/30/06, Catalin Kormos
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Thanks, i'm glad to be here :)
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Sure, i'll prepare a patch and send it
to you, i don't have commit rights
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > yet.
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Catalin
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Sean Schofield
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Catalin,
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Welcome to the team.
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Your dummy form explanation is probably
correct. Someone added a
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > bunch of tags to many of the examples
but probably not all.
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Can you add them to the tomahawk branch?
If you can't commit yet just
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > send me the patch.
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Sean
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > On 5/30/06, Catalin Kormos wrote:
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > I tested also those pages with the
latest from SVN, a first problem is
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > that
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > they are missing an enclosing . Maybe
now this a problem, cause the
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > dummy form is no more added? not sure
though.
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > Catalin
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > Sean Schofield wrote: @Matthias:
Thanks for
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > testing
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > @Everyone: Any ideas on these?
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > Sean
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > On 5/29/06, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > mvn install for tomahawk 1_1_3
worked for me.
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Installed the simple example war.
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Some "pages" causing trouble:
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > -sortTable.jsf (not working; click
on a link has no efect)
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > -sortAutoTable.jsf (same)
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > -pagedSortTable.jsf (clicking on the
scroller icons has no effect,
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > when you click first time.
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > summary: for navigation to next page
(after page has rendered first
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > time) it needs two clicks. after
that each click goes to the next
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > page, as expected)
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > same for upload example too
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Tree2 is working fine
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/26/06, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > I made a tomahawk 1_1_3 branch but
its not compiling at the moment.
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > The references to jsf api and impl
are 1.1.3-SNAPSHOT since 1.1.3 is
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > not in ibiblio yet (we need to
take care of that btw.) I will change
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > them before the official release.
That shouldn't make a difference
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > though.
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm going to be offline for the
weekend. Can some people take a look
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > at this over the weekend and do
some basic testing? Just do a mvn
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > install after checking out the
branch (no RC yet.)
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Sean
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Aechterhoek 18
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > 48282 Emsdetten
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > How low will we go? Check out Yahoo!
Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > rates.
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > ________________________________
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Get on board. You're invited to try the
new Yahoo! Mail Beta.
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > --
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > Aechterhoek 18
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > 48282 Emsdetten
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > >> > >> > > > > > > > mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > >> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > --
> > >> > >> > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > >> > >> > > > > > > Aechterhoek 18
> > >> > >> > > > > > > 48282 Emsdetten
> > >> > >> > > > > > > http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > >> > >> > > > > > > mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > --
> > >> > >> > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > >> > >> > > > > Aechterhoek 18
> > >> > >> > > > > 48282 Emsdetten
> > >> > >> > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > >> > >> > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > >> > >> > > > >
> > >> > >> > > >
> > >> > >> > >
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > --
> > >> > >> > Matthias Wessendorf
> > >> > >> > Aechterhoek 18
> > >> > >> > 48282 Emsdetten
> > >> > >> > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > >> > >> > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> --
> > >> > >> Matthias Wessendorf
> > >> > >> Aechterhoek 18
> > >> > >> 48282 Emsdetten
> > >> > >> blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > >> > >> mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Matthias Wessendorf
> > >> Aechterhoek 18
> > >> 48282 Emsdetten
> > >> blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > >> mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>